Ziva Jewelry, Inc. v. CAR WASH HEADQUARTERS
2004 Ala. LEXIS 238, 897 So.2d 1011, 2004 WL 2090129 (2004)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A bailment for a container does not extend to its unknown contents when the contents are not in plain view and are not of a nature that their presence would be reasonably expected. For a bailee to be liable for such contents, they must have actual or constructive knowledge of their existence, thereby expressly or impliedly accepting responsibility.
Facts:
- Ziva Jewelry, Inc., a jewelry wholesaler, employed Stewart Smith as a traveling sales representative.
- Smith transported valuable jewelry samples, furnished by Ziva, in the padlocked trunk of his personal vehicle.
- Smith was aware that traveling jewelry sales representatives faced a constant and high risk of robbery.
- On August 10, 2000, Smith took his vehicle, with jewelry valued at $851,935 locked in the trunk, to a Rain Tunnel Car Wash owned by Car Wash Headquarters, Inc. (CWH).
- Smith delivered his car and keys to a CWH employee for a car wash service but did not inform the employee of the valuable jewelry in the trunk.
- After the car was washed, and as Smith was waiting to pay, an unknown third party stole the vehicle from the CWH premises.
- The vehicle was recovered a short time later, but the jewelry was missing from the trunk.
Procedural Posture:
- Ziva Jewelry, Inc. filed a lawsuit against Car Wash Headquarters, Inc. in an Alabama trial court, alleging negligence, breach of an oral contract, and breach of a bailment.
- CWH moved for summary judgment, arguing no bailment for the jewelry was ever created and that it was not responsible for the criminal acts of a third party.
- The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of CWH.
- Ziva Jewelry, Inc. appealed the trial court's grant of summary judgment to the Supreme Court of Alabama.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a bailment of a vehicle extend to valuable, concealed contents within the vehicle of which the bailee has no actual or constructive knowledge, thereby making the bailee liable for the loss of those contents?
Opinions:
Majority - Stuart, J.
No. A bailment of a vehicle does not automatically create a bailment for valuable and concealed contents of which the bailee has no knowledge. To create a bailment, the bailee must voluntarily assume custody and possession of the property, which requires either express or implied acceptance. In this case, CWH accepted a bailment for the vehicle but not for the jewelry because its employees were never made aware of the jewelry's existence. Adopting the reasoning from other jurisdictions, the court held that a bailee is only liable for contents it has actual knowledge of or contents it could reasonably expect to find inside the bailed item. Since the jewelry was not in plain view and its presence was not disclosed, CWH could not have reasonably foreseen or expected it was taking responsibility for over $850,000 in jewelry. Therefore, no bailment for the jewelry was formed. Furthermore, CWH is not liable under a general negligence theory for the criminal acts of a third party, as the specific crime—theft of valuable jewelry—was not foreseeable to CWH, especially since they were unaware of the jewelry's presence.
Analysis:
This decision solidifies Alabama's position on the scope of bailment, particularly concerning 'container' cases. By adopting the 'reasonable expectation' test, the court limits the liability of bailees, such as car washes and valet services, to only those items they knowingly accept or should reasonably anticipate. This ruling places a clear burden on the bailor to disclose the presence of unusually valuable items if they wish to hold the bailee responsible for them. The case serves as a significant precedent for defining the limits of a bailee's duty of care and protects businesses from unforeseeable and potentially ruinous liability for concealed valuables.
