Zenz v. Quinlivan
213 F.2d 914 (1954)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A corporate stock redemption that is part of an integrated plan to completely terminate a shareholder's interest in the corporation is not essentially equivalent to the distribution of a taxable dividend. Instead, it is treated as a sale of a capital asset subject to capital gains tax.
Facts:
- A taxpayer inherited all issued shares of stock in a closed corporation from her deceased husband.
- Following a divorce from her second husband who had been managing the business, the taxpayer decided to sell the company.
- She found a competitor who wished to purchase the business but did not want to acquire the corporation's accumulated earnings and profits due to potential tax liabilities.
- To structure the sale, the taxpayer first sold a portion of her stock to the competitor for cash.
- Three weeks later, as part of the same plan, the corporation redeemed the remainder of the taxpayer's stock.
- This redemption was funded by substantially all of the corporation's accumulated earnings and surplus.
- The combined effect of the sale and the redemption was the complete termination of the taxpayer's ownership interest in the corporation.
Procedural Posture:
- The Commissioner of Internal Revenue assessed a tax deficiency against the taxpayer, treating the corporate redemption payment as ordinary income equivalent to a dividend.
- The taxpayer challenged the deficiency assessment in the U.S. District Court (the court of first instance).
- The District Court sustained the Commissioner's deficiency assessment, finding the redemption was essentially equivalent to a taxable dividend.
- The taxpayer, as appellant, appealed the District Court's judgment to the U.S. Court of Appeals.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Is a corporation's distribution of its accumulated earnings to redeem all of a sole shareholder's remaining stock, as part of a plan to completely terminate her interest in the company, essentially equivalent to the distribution of a taxable dividend under Section 115(g) of the Internal Revenue Code?
Opinions:
Majority - Gourley, J.
No. A corporate distribution that completely extinguishes a shareholder’s interest in the corporation is not essentially equivalent to a taxable dividend. The court reasoned that the statutory concept of a dividend contemplates a distribution to a shareholder who remains an interested party in the corporation. When a transaction, viewed as a whole, results in the complete termination of a shareholder's interest, it should be treated as a sale or liquidation of that interest, not a dividend. The taxpayer's motive to minimize taxes is irrelevant, as taxpayers have the legal right to structure transactions to decrease their tax liability by any means the law permits. Because the taxpayer's intent and the transaction's result was a complete separation from the corporation, the redemption payment was part of the sale of a capital asset, not a dividend distribution.
Analysis:
This decision established the validity of what is now commonly known as a 'Zenz transaction.' It provides a crucial framework for structuring corporate acquisitions where a buyer doesn't want to purchase a target company with large accumulated earnings. By allowing the sale and redemption to be viewed as a single, integrated plan, the case affirmed that the 'essentially equivalent to a dividend' test focuses on the ultimate result of the transaction on the shareholder's interest, rather than its form or tax-avoidance motive. This holding solidifies the principle that a complete termination of interest qualifies for capital gains treatment, providing taxpayers with a predictable and tax-efficient method for selling a business.
