Zahn v. Transamerica Corporation
162 F.2d 36 (1947)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A controlling stockholder and the directors it controls are fiduciaries for all stockholders and may not use their power to redeem a class of stock for the sole purpose of appropriating the corporation's assets for their own benefit. While a stock redemption may be permitted by the corporate charter, it is a breach of fiduciary duty to execute it as part of a scheme to unfairly eliminate minority shareholders before a liquidation that will capture a massive, undisclosed increase in asset value.
Facts:
- Axton-Fisher Tobacco Company's charter allowed its board of directors to redeem its Class A common stock for $60 per share plus accrued dividends.
- Transamerica Corporation acquired a controlling interest in Axton-Fisher, eventually owning a majority of the voting stock and dominating its board of directors.
- Axton-Fisher's principal asset, an inventory of leaf tobacco, secretly skyrocketed in value from its book value of approximately $6 million to a market value of about $20 million.
- Transamerica was aware of this substantial, undisclosed increase in the asset's value, while the public Class A stockholders were not.
- On April 30, 1943, the Axton-Fisher board, controlled by Transamerica, passed a resolution to redeem all outstanding Class A stock at a price that amounted to $80.80 per share.
- Shortly after the redemption of the Class A stock was completed, Transamerica caused Axton-Fisher to be liquidated and its assets sold.
- Upon liquidation, the remaining assets, including the proceeds from the highly valued tobacco, were distributed to the Class B stockholders, which was almost entirely Transamerica, resulting in a value far exceeding the price paid to the former Class A stockholders.
- Zahn was a holder of Class A stock who contended that had he been allowed to participate in the liquidation, he would have received approximately $240 per share.
Procedural Posture:
- Zahn, a Class A stockholder, sued Transamerica Corporation in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware on behalf of himself and all similarly situated stockholders.
- Transamerica filed a motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action.
- The U.S. District Court granted Transamerica's motion to dismiss.
- Zahn (as appellant) appealed the dismissal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a controlling stockholder, acting through the corporation's board of directors which it dominates, breach its fiduciary duty to minority stockholders by causing the corporation to redeem their stock at a specified price when the redemption is not for a legitimate corporate purpose but is part of a plan to capture the corporation's undisclosed appreciated asset value for the controlling stockholder's exclusive benefit through a subsequent liquidation?
Opinions:
Majority - Biggs, Circuit Judge
Yes. A controlling stockholder breaches its fiduciary duty to minority stockholders when it uses its power over the board of directors to redeem their stock as part of a plan to capture the corporation's undisclosed appreciated asset value for its own exclusive benefit. The court reasoned that directors and controlling shareholders owe a fiduciary duty of loyalty and fairness to all stockholders. While the Axton-Fisher charter granted the board the power to redeem the Class A stock, this power is not absolute and must be exercised in good faith for a legitimate corporate purpose, not as a device for self-enrichment at the expense of the minority. The court distinguished between a stockholder voting in their own self-interest and a director who must act as a trustee for all shareholders. Because Transamerica controlled the board, the directors were not exercising independent judgment but were acting as mere instruments for Transamerica's plan. The redemption was found to be a preliminary step in a scheme to liquidate the company and appropriate its hidden value for Transamerica, which constituted a breach of trust and was voidable in equity.
Analysis:
This case is a landmark decision in corporate law that reinforces the fiduciary duties of controlling shareholders to the minority. It establishes that technical compliance with corporate charters and statutes does not shield fiduciaries from liability when their actions are part of an unfair, self-dealing scheme. The court's willingness to look beyond the form of the transaction (a redemption) to its substance and purpose (a freeze-out to capture asset value) has been influential. This precedent strengthens protections for minority shareholders against oppressive actions by those in control, requiring that significant corporate actions be inherently fair to all shareholders, not just legally permissible.
