Young v. Giles County Board of Education
2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 170695, 181 F.Supp. 3d 459, 2015 WL 9413877 (2015)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A public school may not prohibit student speech on a political topic unless it can show that the speech is likely to cause a material and substantial disruption to the educational environment; an undifferentiated fear or apprehension of disturbance is insufficient justification.
Facts:
- On the first day of her senior year, high school student Rebecca Young wore a t-shirt to school that read 'Some People Are Gay, Get Over It.'
- The t-shirt did not cause any disruptions, and no students or faculty members expressed any hostility or offense to Young throughout the school day.
- At the end of the day, the school principal, Micah Landers, told Young she could not wear her t-shirt or any other apparel referencing LGBT rights to school.
- Principal Landers justified the ban to Young and her mother by stating it was necessary to protect Young from potential 'bullying or harassment.'
- The Director of Schools for the county, Phillip J. Wright, separately justified the ban by stating that 'pro-LGBT messages are sexual in nature and, therefore, prohibited by the dress code.'
- In a subsequent letter, the school also cited general dress code policies against attire that is 'disruptive' to the learning atmosphere.
Procedural Posture:
- Rebecca Young (Plaintiff) filed suit against the Giles County Board of Education and two school officials (Defendants) in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee.
- The complaint alleged violations of her First and Fourteenth Amendment rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
- Plaintiff filed a Motion for a Preliminary Injunction seeking to enjoin Defendants from restricting her ability to express support for LGBT rights.
- Defendants failed to respond to the Plaintiff's motion or enter an appearance in the case before the court issued its ruling on the preliminary injunction.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a public school's prohibition of a student's t-shirt expressing support for LGBT rights, based on an unsubstantiated fear of potential bullying or disruption, violate the student's First Amendment right to freedom of speech?
Opinions:
Majority - Sharp, J.
Yes, a public school's prohibition of a student's t-shirt expressing support for LGBT rights violates the First Amendment when it is based on an unsubstantiated fear of disruption. Citing Tinker v. Des Moines, the court affirmed that students do not 'shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate.' To justify restricting student political speech, school officials bear the burden of showing that the expression would 'materially and substantially interfere' with school operations. In this case, Young's shirt caused no disruption whatsoever. The school's justification—a fear of potential bullying—was merely an 'undifferentiated fear or apprehension of disturbance,' which Tinker explicitly states is not enough to overcome First Amendment rights. The court found that the school provided only conclusory statements and no evidence that the speech would disrupt the school environment. Furthermore, the court noted that by specifically banning pro-LGBT messages, the school engaged in viewpoint discrimination, an 'egregious violation of the First Amendment.'
Analysis:
This decision reinforces the high standard established in Tinker v. Des Moines for censoring student political speech. It clarifies that messages supporting LGBT rights are considered political speech and cannot be categorically banned as inherently sexual or disruptive. The ruling serves as a strong precedent against the use of a 'heckler's veto,' where speech is suppressed based on speculative fears of a hostile audience reaction. This strengthens protections for students wishing to express views on controversial social and political issues within the school environment.
