Woodward v. Commissioner of Social Security
435 Mass. 536 (2002)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A child conceived through artificial insemination after the death of a genetic parent may inherit from that parent's intestate estate only if the surviving parent can prove the decedent affirmatively consented to both the posthumous conception and to supporting any resulting child.
Facts:
- In January 1993, Warren Woodward was diagnosed with leukemia.
- Advised that his treatment could cause sterility, Warren and his wife, Lauren Woodward, arranged for his semen to be medically withdrawn and preserved.
- Warren Woodward's treatment was unsuccessful, and he died in October 1993.
- Lauren Woodward underwent artificial insemination using her deceased husband's preserved semen.
- In October 1995, approximately two years after Warren's death, Lauren gave birth to twin girls.
Procedural Posture:
- Lauren Woodward applied for Social Security survivor benefits for her children, which the Social Security Administration (SSA) denied.
- Woodward then filed a complaint in Massachusetts Probate and Family Court, which entered a judgment of paternity declaring her deceased husband the father.
- The SSA was not a party to the probate action and refused to honor the judgment, and its denial of benefits was affirmed by a U.S. administrative law judge.
- The SSA Appeals Council affirmed the administrative law judge's decision, making it the final agency action.
- Woodward appealed to the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts.
- Finding no controlling state precedent, the U.S. District Court certified a question of law to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Do children conceived after the death of their genetic father, using his preserved sperm, enjoy the same inheritance rights as natural children under Massachusetts's law of intestate succession?
Opinions:
Majority - Marshall, C.J.
Yes, in limited circumstances. A posthumously conceived child may enjoy the inheritance rights of 'issue' under Massachusetts intestacy law if specific conditions are met. The court's reasoning balances three competing state interests: the best interests of the child, the orderly administration of estates, and the reproductive rights of the deceased individual. First, the court recognized the strong legislative policy of protecting all children and affording them the same rights regardless of the circumstances of their birth. Second, to ensure the orderly administration of estates, the court requires a judicial determination of parentage, which provides certainty. Third, respecting the decedent's reproductive autonomy, the court held that 'forced procreation is not an area amenable to judicial enforcement,' meaning a decedent's intent to parent after death cannot be presumed. Therefore, the court established a test requiring the surviving parent to prove both a genetic relationship and the decedent's clear and unequivocal consent not only to posthumous reproduction but also to the support of any resulting child.
Analysis:
This case is a landmark decision of first impression that addresses the intersection of modern reproductive technology and traditional inheritance law. It establishes a new, flexible legal framework for determining the inheritance rights of posthumously conceived children, rejecting a bright-line rule that would either always or never grant such rights. By creating a two-part consent test, the court balances the interests of the child, the state, and the decedent, placing a significant burden of proof on the surviving parent. This ruling provides guidance for future cases in this developing area of law and implicitly calls for legislative action to create a more comprehensive statutory scheme for assistive reproduction issues.
Unlock the full brief for Woodward v. Commissioner of Social Security