Woelk v. Luckhardt
1938 Neb. LEXIS 12, 277 N.W. 836, 134 Neb. 55 (1938)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
Under Nebraska's anti-lapse statute, the term 'relation' refers exclusively to relatives by consanguinity (blood). Therefore, a devise to a spouse, who is a relative by affinity (marriage), will lapse if the spouse predeceases the testator.
Facts:
- In 1920, John Luekhardt executed a will leaving all of his property to his wife, Amalia Luekhardt, using the language 'her heirs and assigns forever.'
- Amalia Luekhardt had two sons, William and Samuel Woelk, from a previous marriage.
- John and Amalia Luekhardt had four children together.
- In 1934, Amalia Luekhardt died, predeceasing her husband.
- In 1935, John Luekhardt died, survived by his four children and his two stepsons (Amalia's sons).
Procedural Posture:
- John Luekhardt's will was admitted to probate in the county court for Lancaster county.
- The administrator petitioned the county court to distribute the estate's assets only to the four children of John and Amalia Luekhardt.
- William and Samuel Woelk, Amalia's sons from a prior marriage, petitioned the same court for distribution to be made to all six of Amalia's children.
- The county court ordered distribution to only the four children of John Luekhardt.
- William and Samuel Woelk (appellees) appealed the county court's order to the district court for Lancaster county.
- The district court reversed the county court and held that all six children were entitled to share in the distribution.
- The administrator and the four children of John Luekhardt (appellants) appealed the district court's judgment to the Supreme Court of Nebraska.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does the term 'other relation' in Nebraska's anti-lapse statute, Comp. St. 1929, § 30-229, include the testator's wife, thereby preventing a devise to her from lapsing when she predeceases the testator?
Opinions:
Majority - Munday, District Judge
No. The term 'other relation' in the anti-lapse statute does not include a spouse, and therefore the devise to Amalia Luekhardt lapsed. The term is limited to relationships of consanguinity. First, the phrase 'her heirs and assigns forever' in the will are words of limitation that describe the nature of the estate given (an absolute gift), not words of purchase that would create a substitute gift for her heirs. Second, the court analyzed the anti-lapse statute, which saves a devise made to a 'child or other relation' who predeceases the testator. Citing uniform precedent from other jurisdictions with similar statutes (Massachusetts, Michigan, Wisconsin), the court held that 'relation' signifies kindred by blood only and excludes relatives by affinity, such as a spouse. The rule of statutory construction 'ejusdem generis' supports this, as 'other relation' following 'child' should be interpreted to mean relations of the same kind, i.e., blood relatives. The fact that a wife is an heir under statutes of descent and distribution is irrelevant, as those statutes serve a different purpose than the anti-lapse statute.
Analysis:
This decision establishes a clear and strict interpretation of Nebraska's anti-lapse statute, aligning it with the majority rule in the United States. It solidifies the distinction between consanguinity and affinity for purposes of testamentary succession under the statute, creating a predictable but potentially harsh outcome where a testator's presumed intent to benefit a spouse's entire family line might be frustrated. The case serves as a crucial reminder for estate planners to include explicit contingent beneficiaries in wills to avoid the lapsing of bequests to spouses and to ensure stepchildren are provided for if intended.
