Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida
754 So. 2d 67, 2000 WL 257168 (2000)

ELI5:

Rule of Law:

A juvenile defendant waives the statutory right to be processed in the juvenile justice system if they intentionally misrepresent their age as an adult to authorities to secure a benefit, such as a bond or leniency, and fail to disclose their true age during plea proceedings.

Facts:

The defendant, whose real name is Lorenzo Laron Brown, was arrested for possession of cocaine and cannabis.
At the time of his arrest, Brown was a juvenile but used the alias 'Herman Williams' and told police he was born in 1979, representing himself as an adult.
Brown lied about his age specifically because he believed that as an adult he could post bond and be released quickly, whereas juveniles would be detained.
Brown maintained this deception throughout his initial interactions with the legal system.
While posing as an adult, Brown accepted a sentence of probation for the drug charges.
Brown subsequently violated the terms of his probation.
Upon facing jail time for the violation and new charges, Brown finally revealed his true age to his new attorney to challenge the validity of his earlier conviction.

Procedural Posture:

The State charged the defendant in the adult division of the trial court.
The trial court withheld adjudication and sentenced the defendant to probation based on a guilty plea.
The State filed an affidavit alleging violation of probation.
The trial court adjudicated the defendant guilty and sentenced him to 364 days in jail.
The defendant filed a motion to vacate the judgment and sentence in the trial court, asserting his juvenile status.
The trial court denied the motion to vacate.
The defendant appealed the denial to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Premium Content

Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief

You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture

Issue:

Does a juvenile defendant waive their statutory right to be prosecuted in the juvenile justice system when they intentionally lie about their age to authorities to appear as an adult for the purpose of obtaining a bond and subsequently plead guilty in adult court without disclosing their true age?

Opinions:

Majority - Judge Gross

Yes, a juvenile waives the right to juvenile processing by intentionally lying about their age to gain a tactical advantage in the adult system. The court reasoned that the case was controlled by Smith v. State, where a defendant similarly lied to avoid juvenile detention and secure probation. The court rejected the argument that trying a juvenile as an adult creates a jurisdictional defect, clarifying that the Circuit Court has jurisdiction over all felonies regardless of age. Rather, juvenile status confers a statutory right to special treatment. Like other rights, this can be waived. By lying to secure a bond and remaining silent about his age during the plea conference to accept the benefits of probation, the appellant voluntarily submitted to the adult court's authority and waived his right to later claim juvenile status when the outcome became unfavorable.

Analysis:

This decision reinforces the principle of estoppel in criminal procedure, preventing defendants from manipulating the justice system. It establishes that while Florida law grants juveniles the right to be treated differently from adults, this right is not absolute and does not constitute subject matter jurisdiction. Consequently, a defendant cannot use the court's resources to obtain a favorable outcome (probation) as an adult, and then retroactively claim juvenile status only when facing the negative consequences (revocation of probation). The ruling emphasizes that the defendant's active deception for personal gain (obtaining bond) distinguishes this case from situations where a juvenile might be tried as an adult due to mere oversight.

Gunnerbot

AI-powered case assistant

Loaded: Williams v. State (2000)

Try: "What was the holding?" or "Explain the dissent"