Williams v. Gerber Products Co.
2008 WL 5273731, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 27421, 552 F.3d 934 (2008)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
Under the 'reasonable consumer' standard for deceptive advertising, potentially misleading statements and images on the front of a product's packaging are not automatically cured by a factually accurate ingredient list elsewhere on the package. Whether such packaging is likely to deceive a reasonable consumer is generally a question of fact that is not appropriate for dismissal as a matter of law.
Facts:
- Gerber Products Company ('Gerber') manufactured and sold a product for toddlers called 'Fruit Juice Snacks' as part of its 'Graduates for Toddlers' line.
- The product's packaging featured the words 'Fruit Juice' next to images of various fruits, including oranges, peaches, strawberries, and cherries.
- A statement on the side panel of the packaging claimed the product was made 'with real fruit juice and other all natural ingredients.'
- Another statement on the side panel described the product as 'one of a variety of nutritious Gerber Graduates foods and juices.'
- The two most prominent ingredients in the product were corn syrup and sugar, and the only juice it contained was white grape juice from concentrate.
- The product did not contain any juice from the fruits pictured on the front of the packaging.
- Nakia Williams and Rita Tabiu, parents of toddlers, purchased the Fruit Juice Snacks for their children, relying on the packaging and the Gerber brand's reputation for healthy products.
Procedural Posture:
- Nakia Williams and Rita Tabiu filed a class action lawsuit against Gerber Products Company in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, a federal trial court.
- The complaint alleged violations of California's Unfair Competition Law and Consumer Legal Remedies Act, among other claims.
- Gerber filed a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim.
- The district court granted Gerber's motion, concluding that the packaging was not likely to deceive a reasonable consumer as a matter of law.
- Williams and Tabiu, as appellants, appealed the district court's dismissal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Is product packaging that contains potentially misleading images and statements shielded from claims of deceptive advertising as a matter of law simply because an accurate ingredient list is provided elsewhere on the package?
Opinions:
Majority - Pregerson, Circuit Judge
No, product packaging that contains potentially misleading images and statements is not shielded from claims of deceptive advertising as a matter of law simply because an accurate ingredient list is provided. Such claims should generally not be dismissed before the factual questions can be reviewed. The court reasoned that a reasonable consumer should not be expected to look beyond misleading representations on the front of a box to discover the truth from an ingredient list in small print on the side. The court stated that the purpose of an ingredient list is to provide more detailed information, not to correct misleading statements or serve as a shield for deception. The court identified several elements of the packaging that could deceive a reasonable consumer, including the name 'Fruit Juice Snacks,' the images of fruits not contained in the product, and claims that the product was 'nutritious' and made with 'all natural ingredients.' Therefore, whether the packaging is deceptive is a question of fact that should not have been decided on a motion to dismiss.
Analysis:
This decision significantly impacts consumer protection law by establishing that misleading 'front-of-pack' labeling cannot be legally excused by 'back-of-pack' disclosures. It makes it more difficult for defendants in false advertising cases to obtain early dismissal, thereby increasing the likelihood that such cases will proceed to discovery and potentially trial or settlement. The ruling reinforces the principle that the overall impression created by advertising is paramount under the 'reasonable consumer' standard. Consequently, companies must ensure that the primary messages on their packaging are not deceptive, regardless of the accuracy of a detailed ingredient list.
