Williams v. Dugan
217 Mass. 526 (1914)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
An agent's authority to borrow money on behalf of a principal will not be implied from a general power of attorney. This authority must either be expressly granted in the instrument or be a necessary and inevitable consequence of the duties the agent is authorized to perform.
Facts:
- Bessie Dugan granted her agent, Edward Dugan, a general power of attorney to manage her real estate.
- The instrument authorized Edward to take charge of property, pay taxes, and 'do every act and thing concerning the premises, which I might myself do if personally present.'
- The power of attorney also stated that the enumeration of specific powers did not limit the general powers granted.
- Bessie Dugan also executed two other powers of attorney giving Edward authority to sign mortgage notes in connection with mortgaging her real estate.
- Edward Dugan approached the plaintiff and represented that he needed to borrow $375 to pay Bessie Dugan's taxes.
- Relying on the powers of attorney, the plaintiff loaned the money to Edward and received a negotiable promissory note signed 'Bessie Dugan by Edw Dugan Atty.'
- A large portion of the loan was used to pay Bessie Dugan's property taxes.
- Bessie Dugan was unaware her taxes were unpaid and believed Edward had sufficient funds of hers to pay them.
Procedural Posture:
- The plaintiff sued Bessie Dugan in a trial court to recover the amount of the promissory note.
- The trial court entered a judgment in favor of the plaintiff.
- The defendant, Bessie Dugan, appealed the judgment.
- The case was presented to the appellate court on an agreed statement of facts for a final determination.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a general power of attorney that grants an agent broad authority to manage a principal's property and pay taxes, including a general clause for all necessary acts, implicitly confer the power to borrow money and execute a promissory note on the principal's behalf?
Opinions:
Majority - Rugg, C.J.
No. A general power of attorney does not implicitly grant an agent the authority to borrow money. The power to borrow money is an extraordinary authority that is not to be lightly implied; it must be either expressly granted or be an indispensable necessity for the execution of the agent's conferred duties. The court reasoned that borrowing money is fraught with potential for financial calamity and is not a common incident of the principal-agent relationship. The comprehensive terms and general 'catch-all' clause in Bessie Dugan's power of attorney do not enlarge the agent's powers beyond their fair scope to include the new and alien power of borrowing money. Furthermore, the separate powers of attorney authorizing the execution of 'mortgage notes' are strictly limited to that context and do not confer a general authority to execute promissory notes for unsecured loans.
Analysis:
This decision establishes a strict standard for interpreting an agent's authority under a power of attorney, particularly regarding financial transactions. It clarifies that broad, general language is insufficient to grant extraordinary powers like borrowing money, thereby protecting principals from unforeseen liabilities. The ruling forces third parties, such as lenders, to exercise greater due diligence by requiring explicit language authorizing such transactions in a power of attorney. This precedent solidifies the principle that significant financial powers must be expressly conferred and will not be inferred by courts from general grants of authority.
