Whitehead v. American Coachworks, Inc.
837 So. 2d 678 (2002)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A repair shop that justifiably retains a vehicle under a statutory repairman's privilege for an unpaid, authorized service does not commit fraud or act in bad faith, and is not liable for general damages or attorney's fees, even if it also demands payment for other unauthorized services.
Facts:
- After a vehicular accident, Carrie Whitehead had her damaged Mazda Protégé towed to American Coachworks, Inc.
- Whitehead signed an 'Authorization to Repair' form but had a verbal understanding with American Coachworks that she wanted the car declared a total loss and no repairs were to begin pending an appraisal by her insurer, State Farm.
- State Farm issued an initial low repair estimate and sent a letter to Whitehead instructing her to authorize the shop to repair her vehicle.
- At some point, Whitehead's father authorized American Coachworks to perform a 'tear down' or disassembly of the vehicle to provide evidence to State Farm that the damage was more extensive than its initial estimate.
- American Coachworks sent State Farm a notice with a much higher repair estimate, and on the same day, ordered parts to begin repairs based on State Farm's original low estimate.
- State Farm subsequently declared the vehicle a total loss, paid Whitehead for its value, and took ownership of the vehicle.
- American Coachworks presented a bill to State Farm for towing, disassembly, storage, and the ordered parts.
- When State Farm refused to pay the disassembly and parts charges, American Coachworks refused to release the vehicle.
Procedural Posture:
- Carrie Whitehead and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company sued American Coachworks, Inc. in a Louisiana trial court, alleging tortious conversion and bad faith.
- American Coachworks filed a reconventional demand (counterclaim) against Whitehead and State Farm for breach of contract, seeking payment for its services.
- Following a bench trial, the trial court rendered judgment in favor of Whitehead and State Farm, awarding them damages for vehicle depreciation, loss of use, mental anguish, and attorney's fees.
- The trial court dismissed American Coachworks' reconventional demand in its entirety.
- American Coachworks, as appellant, appealed the trial court's judgment to the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a vehicle repair shop commit fraud or act in bad faith, making it liable for general damages and attorney's fees, when it retains a vehicle to secure payment for an authorized disassembly fee while also demanding payment for prematurely ordered, unauthorized parts?
Opinions:
Majority - Fitzsimmons, J.
No. The repair shop's retention of the vehicle was justified and not fraudulent. The trial court manifestly erred in finding that American Coachworks acted in bad faith or with fraudulent intent. Fraud requires an intent to deceive, which was not established by the evidence; this was a legitimate business dispute. Because the disassembly of the vehicle was authorized by the Whiteheads to prove the extent of the damage, American Coachworks was entitled to the $300 disassembly fee. State Farm's failure to pay this owed fee justified American Coachworks' retention of the vehicle under the statutory repairman's privilege. Therefore, the awards for general damages, depreciation, and attorney fees based on fraud are reversed. However, American Coachworks was not authorized to order parts when it did and its attempt to charge for them, when they could have been returned for a full refund, constituted a failure to mitigate damages.
Analysis:
This decision clarifies the scope and application of the repairman's privilege in Louisiana. It establishes that a shop's right to retain a vehicle for any valid, unpaid charge is not defeated by a concurrent, invalid demand for other unauthorized charges. This protects repair shops from claims of tortious conversion or bad faith when there is a genuine, good-faith dispute over certain parts of a bill, so long as some part of the debt giving rise to the lien is legitimate. The case distinguishes between a valid business dispute and fraudulent intent, setting a higher bar for claimants seeking punitive-style damages like attorney fees in such conflicts.
Unlock the full brief for Whitehead v. American Coachworks, Inc.