Western Rock Company v. Davis
432 S.W.2d 555, 1968 Tex. App. LEXIS 2884 (1968)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
Corporate officers and directors may be held personally liable for a corporation's torts and negligence, and venue established in the county where the tort occurred, when they actively participate in or knowingly direct the wrongful acts, or when the corporate fiction is disregarded to prevent fraud, justify wrong, or evade legal obligations.
Facts:
- Western Rock Company, managed by G.L. Stroud as president and L.C. Fuller as a director, conducted blasting operations in a rock quarry near Jacksboro, Texas, from August 1965 through April 1966.
- L.C. Fuller owned half of Western Rock Company (via his family corporation), leased the company its physical assets, furnished its money, and described himself as its 'father-confessor' due to his extensive financial control and involvement.
- Fuller attended board meetings, visited the job site at least three times, and was in daily contact with Stroud, who personally supervised the Jacksboro operations.
- In early Fall 1965, Stroud received complaints from Jacksboro residents about property damage resulting from the blasting and began tests, while Western Rock Company also started experiencing financial difficulties.
- By January 1966, Stroud informed Fuller about the complaints, the tests performed, a pending lawsuit for damages and injunctive relief against Western Rock, and the unlikelihood of insurance coverage.
- Despite knowing of the complaints, the lawsuit, and the lack of insurance protection, Fuller and Stroud decided to continue blasting activities for another four months; Stroud testified he would have ceased blasting if Fuller had instructed him to.
- Around May 27, 1966, Fuller personally assumed full control of Western Rock Company's operations and assets, and after a jury verdict against the company, all its assets were assigned to and repossessed by Fuller’s family corporation.
Procedural Posture:
- A group of property owners (plaintiffs) sued Western Rock Company, G.L. Stroud, and L.C. Fuller in Jack County, Texas, seeking damages for alleged negligent blasting operations.
- The suit also sought injunctive relief against Western Rock Company.
- G.L. Stroud, L.C. Fuller, and Western Rock Company each filed separate pleas of privilege, requesting to be sued in Dallas County, Texas (their asserted domicile).
- The property owners (appellees) timely controverted these pleas of privilege.
- The trial court overruled the separate pleas of privilege filed by Stroud, Fuller, and Western Rock Company.
- Stroud, Fuller, and Western Rock Company (appellants) appealed the trial court's decision to the Texas Court of Civil Appeals (this court).
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does sufficient evidence support holding a corporate director and president personally and jointly responsible for a corporation's negligent blasting activities, thereby establishing venue in the county where the negligence occurred, when they knowingly permitted and directed the harmful acts and used the corporation as a shell to insulate themselves from liability?
Opinions:
Majority - Justice Langdon
Yes, the evidence adequately supports holding L.C. Fuller and G.L. Stroud individually and jointly responsible for negligent conduct that proximately caused damages in Jack County, thus establishing venue there. The court found that Fuller was the dominating force behind Western Rock Company, which appeared to be a 'shell corporation' used by Fuller and Stroud to carry on destructive blasting activities while personally insulated from responsibility. The court reiterated that the liability of corporate officers and directors arises from their 'participation in the wrong,' not merely their position. Citing precedents like Sutton v. Reagan & Gee, the court affirmed that the corporate fiction should be disregarded when used to perpetrate fraud, as a mere business conduit, to evade legal obligations, or to protect crime or justify wrong, as established in Pacific American Gasoline Co. of Texas v. Miller. Given Fuller's extensive control, daily contact with Stroud, knowledge of complaints and the lawsuit, and the decision to continue blasting despite these facts, his participation in the alleged wrongs was evident. The court concluded that all venue facts, including that an act of negligence occurred in the county, was committed by the defendant, and proximately caused injury, were supported by ample evidence.
Analysis:
This case significantly reinforces the principle that the corporate veil, while typically shielding officers and directors from personal liability, can be pierced when individuals actively participate in or knowingly direct corporate wrongdoing. It clarifies that such personal involvement, especially when coupled with substantial control and knowledge of harm, establishes individual liability. For venue purposes, this decision affirms that the 'act or omission of negligence' can be attributed to individuals who direct or allow corporate negligence, permitting a lawsuit in the county where the harm occurred, even if the individuals are domiciled elsewhere. This ruling serves as a strong warning against using a corporation as a mere instrumentality to evade personal responsibility for knowingly harmful conduct.
