Lexplug logoLexplug

West Coast Airlines, Inc. v. Miner's Aircraft & Engine Service, Inc.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department One
66 Wash.2d 513, 403 P.2d 833 (1965)
ELI5:

Rule of Law:

A sale of a container does not transfer title to its unknown contents if neither the seller nor the buyer intended for the contents to be part of the transaction, as there is no mutual assent or 'meeting of the minds' regarding the contents.


Facts:

  • West Coast Airlines, Inc. (West Coast) owned two aircraft engines, which it sealed in large metal containers known as 'engine cans'.
  • West Coast stored these sealed cans along a fence with a collection of other empty cans and miscellaneous scrap metal.
  • West Coast's purchasing agent asked Junk Traders, a scrap metal company, to pick up the cans along the fence as scrap.
  • Junk Traders purchased and removed the cans, paying West Coast 2 cents per pound for what both parties believed was only scrap metal.
  • Months later, Junk Traders discovered the engines inside two of the cans.
  • Mr. Miner, president of Miner’s Aircraft & Engine Service, Inc., an expert in aircraft engines, learned of their existence at the junkyard.
  • Knowing the engines' high value and that Junk Traders was unaware of it, Miner convinced Junk Traders they were only worth their weight as scrap metal.
  • Miner's Aircraft then 'purchased' the two engines from Junk Traders for $125 and subsequently attempted to contact West Coast to obtain the necessary FAA paperwork, alerting West Coast to its mistake.

Procedural Posture:

  • West Coast Airlines, Inc., filed a replevin action in a Washington state trial court against Miner’s Aircraft & Engine Service, Inc., and Robert Clark to recover possession of two aircraft engines.
  • The trial court entered judgment for West Coast, ordering Miner's Aircraft to return the two engines.
  • The trial court also issued judgments on various cross-claims among the parties.
  • Miner’s Aircraft, the defendant, appealed the adverse judgment to the Supreme Court of Washington.

Locked

Premium Content

Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief

You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture

Issue:

Does the sale of sealed containers for scrap metal transfer legal title to valuable aircraft engines unknowingly stored inside, when neither the seller nor the buyer intended to include the engines in the transaction?


Opinions:

Majority - Stafford, J.

No. The sale of the sealed containers did not transfer legal title to the aircraft engines inside because a valid sale requires a meeting of the minds as to the specific subject matter being transferred. The court reasoned that West Coast intended to sell only scrap metal cans, and Junk Traders intended to buy only scrap metal cans. Since neither party contemplated the engines as part of the transaction, no contract for the sale of the engines was ever formed. Therefore, title to the engines never passed from West Coast to Junk Traders. Because Junk Traders never acquired title, it could not subsequently pass title to Miner's Aircraft, which in any event could not claim the status of a good faith purchaser due to Mr. Miner's knowledge and deceptive conduct.



Analysis:

This decision reinforces the fundamental contract principle that a valid sale requires mutual assent as to the essential terms, including the identity of the goods being sold. It establishes that title to property accidentally or unknowingly included within the subject of a sale does not pass if the parties did not intend for it to be part of the transaction. The case distinguishes a complete lack of contractual formation from the doctrine of mutual mistake, which is used to rescind an existing contract. This precedent is crucial for resolving disputes over 'found' property within sold items and clarifies that a party with superior knowledge who exploits another's ignorance cannot claim the protections of a good faith purchaser.

G

Gunnerbot

AI-powered case assistant

Loaded: West Coast Airlines, Inc. v. Miner's Aircraft & Engine Service, Inc. (1965)

Try: "What was the holding?" or "Explain the dissent"