Wengel v. Wengel
714 N.W.2d 371 (2006)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A cotenant in a joint tenancy with full rights of survivorship may extinguish the other cotenant's life estate interest through adverse possession, but cannot extinguish the indestructible contingent remainder interest, as a cause of action regarding the remainder does not accrue until the death of the precedent life tenant.
Facts:
- In 1972, Plaintiff and Defendant began a romantic relationship, and Defendant moved into Plaintiff's home.
- In 1974, the parties moved into a new property which was titled solely in Plaintiff's name.
- In 1981, Plaintiff transferred the property's title to herself and Defendant 'as joint tenants with full rights of survivorship.'
- In 1985, following a disagreement, Defendant moved out of the home, with Defendant alleging Plaintiff ejected him from the property.
- After Defendant moved out, Plaintiff told him that she intended to retain sole possession of the property and that he should remove his name from the title, which he refused to do without payment.
- From 1985 until the lawsuit was filed in 2004, Plaintiff had exclusive physical possession of the property, performing all maintenance, making all mortgage payments, and paying all taxes.
Procedural Posture:
- On May 12, 2004, Plaintiff filed an action to quiet title against Defendant in the trial court.
- Defendant filed a counterclaim seeking partition and sale of the property, among other claims.
- The trial court ordered the parties to submit briefs on the applicability of adverse possession to a joint tenancy with full rights of survivorship.
- The trial court granted summary disposition in favor of Defendant, ruling that Plaintiff could not establish the element of hostility as a matter of law because of the nature of the tenancy.
- Plaintiff appealed the trial court's order to the Michigan Court of Appeals.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does the doctrine of adverse possession allow one cotenant in a joint tenancy with full rights of survivorship to extinguish both the other cotenant's present life estate interest and future contingent remainder interest?
Opinions:
Majority - Murphy, J.
No, while the doctrine of adverse possession allows a cotenant to extinguish the other's life estate interest, it does not permit the extinguishment of the indestructible contingent remainder. A joint tenancy with full rights of survivorship creates two distinct interests for each party: a joint life estate and a dual contingent remainder. The life estate is a present possessory interest, and a cause of action to recover it accrues upon ouster. Here, Defendant was ousted in 1985, and his failure to bring an action within the 15-year statutory period resulted in the extinguishment of his life estate by Plaintiff's adverse possession, even under the heightened standard of proof required between cotenants. However, the contingent remainder is a future, non-possessory estate. A cause of action to enforce this interest does not accrue until the precedent estate (Plaintiff's life estate) terminates upon her death. Michigan statutes explicitly state that an expectant estate cannot be defeated by any act of the owner of the precedent estate, such as disseisin. Therefore, Plaintiff's possession cannot be adverse to Defendant's contingent remainder, which remains intact.
Analysis:
This decision carves out a nuanced application of adverse possession within the specific context of joint tenancies with full rights of survivorship. By bifurcating the property interest into a possessory life estate and a future contingent remainder, the court allows adverse possession to defeat the former while protecting the latter. This reinforces the 'indestructible' nature of the survivorship right, meaning ouster cannot eliminate a cotenant's chance to take the entire property if they outlive the adverse possessor. The ruling creates a unique legal status where a party can lose their present right to use and possess the property but retain their future right to inherit it, impacting how such properties can be managed, sold, or partitioned.
