Welch v. Helvering, Commissioner of Internal Revenue
290 U.S. 111 (1933)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
Payments made by a taxpayer to the creditors of a third-party bankrupt corporation to strengthen the taxpayer's own business credit and standing are not 'ordinary' business expenses and are therefore not deductible.
Facts:
- The petitioner, Welch, was the secretary of the E. L. Welch Company, a grain business.
- In 1922, the E. L. Welch Company was declared bankrupt and its debts were legally discharged.
- Following the bankruptcy, Welch secured a new contract to work as a commission agent for the Kellogg Company.
- To reestablish his professional relationships and solidify his own credit and standing, Welch decided to personally pay the discharged debts of the former E. L. Welch Company.
- Welch made substantial payments to the old company's creditors over five successive years.
- Welch attempted to deduct these payments as business expenses on his personal income tax returns.
Procedural Posture:
- The Commissioner of Internal Revenue disallowed Welch's deductions, classifying the payments as capital expenditures.
- Welch appealed the Commissioner's decision to the Board of Tax Appeals.
- The Board of Tax Appeals sustained the action of the Commissioner.
- Welch, as appellant, appealed the Board's decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
- The Court of Appeals affirmed the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals.
- The U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari to review the case.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Are voluntary payments made by a taxpayer to the creditors of a discharged bankrupt corporation, for the purpose of strengthening his own business credit and reputation, deductible as 'ordinary and necessary' business expenses under the Revenue Act?
Opinions:
Majority - Mr. Justice Cardozo
No. The payments are not deductible because, while they may have been necessary, they were not ordinary business expenses. The court assumed the payments were 'necessary' in the sense that they were appropriate and helpful to the development of Welch's business. However, the crucial determination is whether they were also 'ordinary.' An 'ordinary' expense is one that is common and accepted in the life of the business community, not one that is merely unique or helpful to the individual taxpayer. Paying the legally discharged debts of another is not a common or normal business practice; it is highly extraordinary. These payments are more analogous to capital expenditures made to acquire goodwill and enhance reputation, which are not deductible as current business expenses.
Analysis:
This landmark case provides a foundational interpretation of the term 'ordinary' within the 'ordinary and necessary' business expense deduction under the Internal Revenue Code. The decision establishes that 'ordinary' refers not to the frequency of an expense for a particular taxpayer, but to its commonality and acceptance as a business practice within the broader commercial world. By classifying the payments as capital outlays for goodwill, the Court reinforced the critical distinction between currently deductible expenses and non-deductible capital expenditures. This ruling gives significant deference to the Commissioner's determination and influences how courts analyze the nature of expenditures related to reputation and business development.
Unlock the full brief for Welch v. Helvering, Commissioner of Internal Revenue