Weigel v. Lee
752 N.W.2d 618 (2008)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
Under North Dakota's wrongful death statutes, a decedent's children, as heirs at law, are entitled to seek recovery for their own non-economic damages, including mental anguish and loss of society and companionship, resulting from a parent's death.
Facts:
- On May 6, 2004, Darlyne Rogers went to an emergency room with abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting.
- Rogers was diagnosed with pneumonia and a bowel obstruction.
- Dr. Lane Lee agreed to treat Rogers, and she was transferred to Trinity Hospital as his patient.
- Despite being critically ill, Rogers was admitted to a regular hospital floor room.
- Approximately three and a half hours after admission, Rogers began vomiting bodily waste and aspirating it into her lungs.
- Rogers died as a result of aspirating the vomit.
- Her adult children are Darla Weigel, Melody Frieson, Diana Seney and Lorna Strand.
Procedural Posture:
- Darlyne Rogers' adult children (the Weigels) sued Dr. Lane Lee and Trinity Hospital in a North Dakota district court for wrongful death, seeking economic and non-economic damages.
- The case was tried before a jury.
- After testimony, the district court interpreted precedent to mean children do not have a claim for loss of parental consortium.
- Because the Weigels could not prove economic damages, the court dismissed the entire case.
- The district court later granted the Weigels a new trial, but ruled they could only pursue a survival action for damages the decedent herself sustained, not for their own non-economic losses.
- The Weigels informed the court they were only seeking non-economic damages for their own injuries resulting from their mother's death.
- Dr. Lee moved to dismiss the case, and the district court granted the motion.
- The Weigels, as appellants, appealed the judgment of dismissal to the Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does North Dakota's wrongful death act permit a decedent's adult children to recover non-economic damages for their own injuries, such as mental anguish and loss of companionship, resulting from their parent's death?
Opinions:
Majority - Crothers, J.
Yes. A decedent's children are entitled to seek recovery of non-economic damages in a wrongful death action. The district court incorrectly blended three distinct claims: common law loss of consortium for personal injury, survival actions, and wrongful death actions. The precedent it relied on, Butz v. World Wide, Inc., was a personal injury case, not a wrongful death case, and is therefore inapplicable. A survival action allows a decedent's estate to recover for the decedent's own pre-death injuries, whereas the Weigels brought a wrongful death action for their own injuries. North Dakota’s wrongful death act is intended to compensate the survivors for the losses they sustained. The statute explicitly allows for non-economic damages, including 'mental anguish' and 'loss of society and companionship,' and designates the 'decedent's heirs at law'—which includes children—as the beneficiaries of such recovery.
Analysis:
This decision clarifies the scope of damages available under North Dakota's wrongful death act by firmly distinguishing it from both common law loss of consortium claims (for non-fatal injuries) and statutory survival actions. It establishes a clear precedent that children can recover for their own non-economic losses, such as grief and loss of companionship, when a parent dies due to another's negligence. This prevents lower courts from misapplying precedent from personal injury cases to statutory wrongful death claims, reinforcing the principle that wrongful death actions are designed to compensate the survivors for their own unique losses.
Unlock the full brief for Weigel v. Lee