Warner Bros., Inc. v. Gay Toys, Inc.
658 F.2d 76, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 18261, 211 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 1017 (1981)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
The unauthorized use of distinctive, non-functional symbols from a creative work on a commercial product violates § 43(a) of the Lanham Act if it creates a likelihood of public confusion regarding the product's source, sponsorship, or approval, even if the owner of the symbols does not directly compete in the market for that product.
Facts:
- Warner Bros., Inc. produced a successful television series called 'The Dukes of Hazzard.'
- The series prominently featured a distinctive car, the 'General Lee,' an orange 1969 Dodge Charger with a Confederate flag on its roof and the number '01' on its doors.
- Gay Toys, Inc. initially produced a non-descript 1969 Dodge Charger toy car.
- After the show's success, Gay Toys sought a license from Warner Bros. to produce a toy version of the 'General Lee' but was refused due to pre-existing exclusive agreements.
- Despite the refusal, Gay Toys began manufacturing and selling the 'Dixie Racer,' a toy car that was bright orange, had a Confederate flag decal, and door numerals ('10' instead of '01'), making it virtually identical to the 'General Lee'.
- Gay Toys sold over 500,000 'Dixie Racer' cars with back orders for 700,000 more, a quantity far exceeding sales of its previous, non-descript model.
Procedural Posture:
- Warner Bros., Inc. sued Gay Toys, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for unfair competition and violations of the Lanham Act.
- Warner Bros. filed a motion for a preliminary injunction to stop Gay Toys from manufacturing and selling the 'Dixie Racer' toy car.
- The District Court denied the motion for a preliminary injunction.
- Warner Bros., Inc., as the plaintiff-appellant, appealed the denial to the U.S. Court of Appeals.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a toy company's unauthorized use of distinctive, non-functional symbols from a popular television show on its toy car violate § 43(a) of the Lanham Act by creating a likelihood of confusion as to sponsorship, even if the television show's producer does not manufacture toy cars?
Opinions:
Majority - Re, Chief Judge
Yes, the unauthorized use of the symbols violates the Lanham Act. The law protects against uses that create a likelihood of confusion as to a product's source or sponsorship, and it is not necessary for the plaintiff to be a direct competitor or manufacturer of the product in question. The district court erred by requiring proof of actual confusion and by finding no likelihood of confusion simply because Warner Bros. does not manufacture toy cars. The public’s belief that the mark’s owner sponsored or otherwise approved the use of the trademark is sufficient to satisfy the confusion requirement. Here, evidence, including a survey showing that children identified the 'Dixie Racer' as the 'General Lee,' overwhelmingly demonstrated a likelihood of confusion that Gay Toys' product was sponsored or authorized by Warner Bros. Gay Toys deliberately copied the symbols to capitalize on the show's popularity, which constitutes unfair competition.
Analysis:
This decision is significant for intellectual property and entertainment law because it reinforces that trademark protection under the Lanham Act extends beyond direct competition to encompass confusion over sponsorship or endorsement. It solidifies the legal principle that creators of popular media can protect the commercial value of their characters, symbols, and distinctive elements against unauthorized merchandising. The ruling prevents competitors from 'reaping where they have not sown' by free-riding on the goodwill and popularity generated by another's creative work, thereby securing the financial incentives for creators to license their properties.
Unlock the full brief for Warner Bros., Inc. v. Gay Toys, Inc.