Wand v. Wand
14 Cal. 512 (1860)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
In a divorce granted due to the husband's fault, the mother is entitled to custody of a child of tender years, as the paramount consideration in custody determinations is the best interest and welfare of the child.
Facts:
- The plaintiff (wife) and defendant (husband) were married and had one daughter, who was six or seven years old.
- The husband, motivated by jealousy, attempted to kill his wife by snapping a loaded pistol at her breast.
- After the pistol failed to discharge, the husband shot himself, inflicting a serious wound.
- There was no evidence of any infidelity or improper conduct on the part of the wife.
- The husband's act of violence was described as a sole deviation from an otherwise affectionate and peaceable demeanor.
- Following the events leading to the divorce, the wife remarried while the husband remained single.
Procedural Posture:
- The plaintiff (wife) filed a lawsuit against the defendant (husband) for divorce in the District Court (trial court) on the grounds of extreme cruelty.
- The trial court granted the decree of divorce.
- In its decree, the trial court awarded custody of the couple's minor child to the defendant father.
- The plaintiff mother appealed the portion of the trial court's decree concerning child custody to the state's highest court.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Is a husband who was divorced for extreme cruelty entitled to custody of a young female child when the mother's conduct is without blame?
Opinions:
Majority - Baldwin, J.
No. A husband divorced for his own fault is not entitled to custody over the innocent mother, because the primary consideration is the good of the child. While a husband is the head of the family during a marriage, that superior status ends upon dissolution. After a divorce, especially one caused by the husband's misconduct, the natural rights of the mother are equal, if not superior, when determining custody. The court's principal duty is to protect the child's interest, which involves their morals, education, and overall welfare. A young female child requires a type of care and constant superintendence that a mother is uniquely positioned to provide, whereas a father's necessary avocations would force him to delegate such care. Therefore, custody should be awarded to the blameless mother, though the father retains the right to visitation.
Analysis:
This decision represents a significant step away from the traditional, rigid rule of paternal preference in child custody disputes. It establishes the 'best interest of the child' as the paramount consideration, overriding the father's presumptive right following a divorce. The court also introduces parental fault as a critical factor, creating a presumption in favor of the innocent parent. This case helped lay the groundwork for modern family law, where custody decisions are based on a holistic assessment of the child's welfare rather than on antiquated gender-based parental rights.
Unlock the full brief for Wand v. Wand