Lexplug logoLexplug

Wallace International Silversmiths, Inc. v. Godinger Silver Art Co., Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
916 F.2d 76 (1990)
ELI5:

Rule of Law:

An ornamental product design feature is aesthetically functional, and therefore not protectable as trade dress, if it is essential to effective competition in a particular market because it constitutes a basic element of an aesthetic style that is part of the public domain.


Facts:

  • Since 1941, Wallace International Silversmiths ('Wallace') has sold a very successful and ornate sterling silver pattern called GRANDE BAROQUE.
  • The GRANDE BAROQUE pattern is characterized by 'ornate, massive and flowery' elements, including scrolls, curls, and flower arrangements.
  • Godinger Silver Art Co., Inc. ('Godinger') began marketing a line of much less expensive silver-plated serving pieces called 20th CENTURY BAROQUE.
  • Godinger's pattern also contained typical baroque design elements such as scrolls, curls, and flowers, arranged in a way that approximated Wallace's design.
  • Godinger admitted that its designers were 'inspired by and aware of' the Wallace design when creating their product.
  • Upon seeing an advertisement for Godinger's product, a wholesale customer expressed confusion to Wallace, asking if the design had been licensed or was a 'knock-off'.

Procedural Posture:

  • Wallace International Silversmiths ('Wallace') filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court against Godinger Silver Art Co. ('Godinger'), alleging federal trademark infringement and state unfair competition.
  • Wallace also filed a motion for a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction to prevent Godinger from marketing its 20th CENTURY BAROQUE products.
  • The district court held a hearing and issued a memorandum opinion and order denying Wallace's motion for a preliminary injunction.
  • The district court reasoned that the GRANDE BAROQUE design was a 'functional feature of “Baroque” style silverware' and therefore ineligible for trade dress protection.
  • Wallace (appellant) appealed the district court's denial of the preliminary injunction to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit; Godinger is the appellee.

Locked

Premium Content

Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief

You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture

Issue:

Is a product's ornamental design feature, which is part of a widely recognized aesthetic style, protectable as trade dress under the Lanham Act when granting such protection would hinder competitors from effectively competing in the market for that style?


Opinions:

Majority - Winter

No. A product's ornamental design feature is not protectable trade dress if it is aesthetically functional. The court held that the core decorative elements of Wallace's GRANDE BAROQUE design—the curls, scrolls, and flowers—are essential requirements for any manufacturer wishing to compete in the market for baroque-style silverware. The court reasoned that trademark law's purpose is to identify a product's source, not to grant a monopoly over an entire aesthetic style that is in the public domain. Protecting Wallace's design would 'hinder competition or impinge upon the rights of others to compete effectively' by preventing them from using the basic elements that define the baroque style. While rejecting the overbroad 'Pagliero' test (where commercial success alone can establish functionality), the court adopted a standard focused on competitive necessity. Because granting protection to these common baroque elements would foreclose competitors from a substantial market, the design is deemed aesthetically functional and ineligible for trade dress protection.



Analysis:

This decision significantly clarifies the doctrine of aesthetic functionality in the Second Circuit, establishing that the key inquiry is competitive necessity, not just aesthetic appeal or commercial success. By holding that design elements essential to a particular style are functional, the court prevents trademark law from being used to create a monopoly over an entire artistic genre. This ruling forces courts to balance a trademark owner's interest in source-identification against the public's and competitors' interests in a competitive marketplace. Future cases involving trade dress claims for product designs will require a careful analysis of whether the protected features are mere source-identifiers or are indispensable elements for competing in a specific aesthetic market.

G

Gunnerbot

AI-powered case assistant

Loaded: Wallace International Silversmiths, Inc. v. Godinger Silver Art Co., Inc. (1990)

Try: "What was the holding?" or "Explain the dissent"