Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Cockrell
61 S.W.3d 774 (2001)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
Under the shopkeeper's privilege, a merchant's detention of a suspected shoplifter is unreasonable in manner if the scope of the search exceeds what is necessary to investigate ownership of property, such as demanding the removal of a surgical bandage without probable cause to believe merchandise is concealed beneath it.
Facts:
- Karl Cockrell and his parents visited a Wal-Mart store's layaway department.
- After approximately five minutes, Cockrell decided to leave the store by himself.
- As he was exiting through the front door, Raymond Navarro, a Wal-Mart loss-prevention officer, stopped him and escorted him to a manager's office.
- In the office, Navarro instructed Cockrell to pull down his pants and shake out his underwear, which revealed nothing.
- Navarro then told Cockrell to take off his shirt; when Cockrell lifted his shirt, it revealed a large surgical bandage covering a wound from a recent liver transplant.
- Despite Cockrell's explanation that the bandage maintained a sterile environment, Navarro insisted that he remove it.
- In the presence of Navarro and two other Wal-Mart employees, Cockrell removed the bandage, exposing his surgical wound.
- After the search revealed nothing, Navarro apologized and allowed Cockrell to leave.
Procedural Posture:
- Karl Cockrell sued Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. in a Texas trial court, alleging false imprisonment and assault.
- The case proceeded to a jury trial.
- The jury found in favor of Cockrell, holding Wal-Mart liable on both claims.
- The jury awarded Cockrell $300,000 in damages for past mental anguish, and the trial court entered a judgment on the verdict.
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., the appellant, appealed the judgment to the Texas Court of Appeals, with Karl Cockrell as the appellee.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a store's search of a suspected shoplifter, which includes demanding the removal of a sterile surgical bandage from a recent wound, exceed the scope of a detention conducted in a 'reasonable manner' as permitted by the shopkeeper's privilege?
Opinions:
Majority - Dorsey, Justice
Yes, such a search exceeds the scope of a reasonable detention. For a detention to be lawful under the shopkeeper's privilege, it must be based on a reasonable belief of theft and conducted in a reasonable manner. The court found that a jury could rationally conclude that the loss-prevention officer, Navarro, did not have a reasonable belief that Cockrell had stolen anything, as no one saw him steal and his 'suspicious' behavior was ambiguous. More importantly, even if a reasonable belief existed, the manner of the detention was unreasonable. While a contemporaneous search of a person may be permissible, its scope is limited to what is reasonably necessary to investigate the ownership of property. Navarro had no probable cause to believe merchandise was hidden under Cockrell's surgical bandage, and demanding its removal compromised the sterile environment of the wound, making the search unreasonable in scope.
Analysis:
This case significantly clarifies the 'reasonable manner' element of the shopkeeper's privilege in Texas. It establishes that the privilege does not grant merchants unlimited authority to search a suspect's person. The court sets a clear boundary, holding that highly invasive and potentially harmful searches, such as the removal of a medical dressing, are unreasonable without specific probable cause. This decision strengthens protections for individuals against overly intrusive detentions by private security, balancing a merchant's property rights with an individual's right to bodily integrity and dignity.
Unlock the full brief for Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Cockrell