Vlases v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
377 F.2d 846 (1967)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
Under the Uniform Commercial Code, a seller is liable for a breach of the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose even if the goods sold have a latent, undetectable defect.
Facts:
- Paul Vlases, after years of preparation, built a new, two-story chicken coop with all new equipment to house 4,000 chickens for an egg production business.
- In November 1961, Vlases ordered 2,000 one-day-old hybrid Leghorn chicks from a Montgomery Ward catalogue, which were noted for their excellent egg production.
- On December 21, 1961, Vlases received 2,200 chicks and placed them in the new, sanitized coop, taking extensive hygienic precautions and giving them his undivided attention.
- Within a few weeks of delivery, the chickens began showing signs of illness, including losing their feathers.
- Months later, in August 1962, the flock was formally diagnosed with avian leukosis complex, a form of bird cancer that is transmissible through the egg.
- The disease eventually infected the entire flock, killing many chickens, causing the rest to be destroyed, and resulting in almost no egg production.
Procedural Posture:
- Paul Vlases (plaintiff) filed a two-count suit in assumpsit against Montgomery Ward (defendant) in the United States District Court, based on diversity jurisdiction.
- The suit alleged claims of negligence and breach of implied warranties.
- During the trial, the plaintiff dropped the negligence claim.
- The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff on the breach of warranty claim for $23,028.77.
- The defendant, Montgomery Ward, appealed the district court's judgment to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a seller's inability to detect a latent defect in goods, such as a disease in one-day-old chickens, absolve the seller from liability for breach of the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose?
Opinions:
Majority - McLaughlin, J.
No. A seller's inability to discover or prevent a latent defect in goods does not eliminate liability for breach of implied warranties. The purpose of the UCC's implied warranty sections is to hold sellers responsible when they pass inferior goods to an unsuspecting buyer. The focus of a breach of warranty claim is on the quality of the goods delivered, not on the seller's knowledge, skill, or ability to prevent the defect. The fact that avian leukosis is undetectable in one-day-old chicks would be relevant to a negligence claim, but it is not a defense to a breach of warranty claim. The only way for a seller to escape liability is through a specific and valid disclaimer under UCC § 2-316, which was not present here. The evidence was sufficient for the jury to conclude that the chickens were diseased at the time of delivery, as Vlases provided a completely new and sanitary environment, making it highly probable the disease was inherited through the egg rather than acquired environmentally.
Analysis:
This case solidifies the principle that implied warranties under the UCC create a form of strict liability for sellers. It clearly distinguishes warranty claims from negligence claims by emphasizing that the seller's fault or ability to discover a defect is irrelevant. The decision places the economic risk of latent, undiscoverable defects on the seller, who is in a better position to absorb or distribute such losses. This strengthens consumer protection by ensuring buyers receive goods that meet the basic standards of merchantability and fitness for their intended purpose, regardless of the seller's knowledge or care.
Unlock the full brief for Vlases v. Montgomery Ward & Co.