Vinikoor v. Pedal Pennsylvania, Inc.
974 A.2d 1233 (2009)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
An exculpatory clause in a contract for a recreational activity is enforceable if it is unambiguous, does not contravene public policy, and clearly states the intention to release a party from liability for its own negligence.
Facts:
- Paul M. Vinikoor, an experienced bicyclist, registered for a week-long bicycle tour organized by Pedal Pennsylvania, Inc. (Pedal).
- Pedal represented that it had inspected the route for safety and provided participants with a cue sheet that noted potential dangers.
- The cue sheet for the day of the accident did not contain a caution for the intersection where the incident occurred.
- Prior to the tour, Vinikoor signed a 'Waiver, Release and Consent' form.
- The form stated that the signer would 'waive and discharge Pedal Pennsylvania, Inc. ... from all liability as a result of my participation in Pedal Pennsylvania, whether caused by negligence or otherwise.'
- During the tour, Vinikoor's front bicycle tire became trapped in a groove on the roadway, causing him to fall and suffer serious injuries, including a dislocated pelvis.
Procedural Posture:
- Paul M. Vinikoor sued Pedal Pennsylvania, Inc. (Pedal) and the Department of Transportation (Department) for negligence in the Court of Common Pleas of Blair County (trial court).
- Both Pedal and the Department filed motions for summary judgment.
- The trial court granted Pedal's motion for summary judgment, finding the exculpatory waiver was enforceable, but denied the Department's motion.
- Vinikoor (appellant) petitioned the appellate court for permission to appeal the trial court's interlocutory order in favor of Pedal (appellee), and the petition was granted.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a pre-injury exculpatory waiver, which releases a bicycle tour organizer from 'all liability... whether caused by negligence or otherwise,' bar a participant's subsequent negligence lawsuit for injuries sustained during the event?
Opinions:
Majority - Senior Judge Flaherty
Yes, the exculpatory waiver bars the participant's negligence claim. A release is enforceable when its language is clear and demonstrates the parties' intent to release a party from liability for its own negligence. Here, the waiver unambiguously states that Pedal is released from 'all liability... whether caused by negligence or otherwise,' which Vinikoor, an experienced cyclist, read and understood before signing. The court found no internal conflict or ambiguity, reasoning that the waiver's first two paragraphs established a general release, while the third paragraph addressed specific off-route scenarios without contradicting the overall release. Furthermore, the waiver does not contravene public policy because bicycling is a voluntary recreational activity, not an essential public service, and participants can choose not to engage in it if they do not wish to accept the terms of the release.
Analysis:
This decision reinforces the strong legal protection afforded to organizers of recreational activities in Pennsylvania through the use of exculpatory waivers. It clarifies that even when an organizer makes specific safety assurances, a broadly worded and unambiguous waiver that explicitly covers negligence will likely be enforced. The case serves as a precedent that makes it difficult for plaintiffs to overcome such waivers by arguing they are ambiguous or create internal contradictions. It also highlights the continued viability of the 'assumption of the risk' doctrine as a secondary defense in cases involving inherent risks of recreational pursuits.
Unlock the full brief for Vinikoor v. Pedal Pennsylvania, Inc.