Village of Skokie v. National Socialist Party of America
14 Ill. Dec. 890, 373 N.E.2d 21, 69 Ill. 2d 605 (1978)
Rule of Law:
The public display of offensive symbols, such as swastikas, constitutes symbolic political speech protected by the First Amendment and cannot be enjoined as "fighting words" merely because it offends viewers or creates a risk of a hostile audience reaction.
Facts:
- The Village of Skokie had a population of approximately 70,000, including over 40,000 Jewish residents and several thousand survivors of Nazi concentration camps.
- The National Socialist Party of America (NSPA) notified the village of their intent to hold a peaceful public assembly to protest insurance requirements for park use.
- The demonstration plan involved 30 to 50 members marching in single file in front of the village hall for 20 to 30 minutes.
- Demonstrators intended to wear uniforms resembling those of the German Nazi Party, including swastika armbands, and carry banners displaying the swastika.
- The NSPA stated they would not distribute handbills, obstruct traffic, or make derogatory statements, but would carry signs advocating "White Free Speech."
- Holocaust survivors testified that the display would be traumatic and interpreted as a threat that the Nazi persecution was not over.
- Jewish organizations scheduled a massive counter-demonstration of 12,000 to 15,000 people for the same day.
- Evidence presented at the hearing suggested that the confrontation between the two groups would likely result in violence.
Procedural Posture:
- The Village of Skokie filed a complaint in the Circuit Court of Cook County seeking to enjoin the defendants from demonstrating.
- The Circuit Court entered an order enjoining the defendants from marching in uniform, displaying swastikas, or distributing materials inciting hatred.
- The defendants appealed the injunction to the Illinois Appellate Court.
- The Appellate Court modified the order, allowing the marching and uniforms but upholding the injunction against displaying swastikas.
- The defendants petitioned the Illinois Supreme Court for leave to appeal the remaining ban on the swastika.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a court injunction prohibiting a group from displaying swastikas during a planned peaceful demonstration violate the First Amendment rights of the demonstrators?
Opinions:
Majority - Per Curiam
Yes, the injunction prohibiting the display of swastikas violates the First Amendment. The court reasoned that while the swastika is deeply offensive and abhorrent, it constitutes symbolic political speech intended to convey the beliefs of the demonstrators. Relying on Cohen v. California, the court held that the "fighting words" doctrine applies only to personally abusive epithets directed at a specific individual that are likely to provoke immediate violence, not to general displays of offensive symbols. Furthermore, the court determined that the anticipation of a hostile audience reaction (a "heckler's veto") cannot justify a prior restraint on speech. Finally, because the NSPA gave advance notice of their plans, the citizens of Skokie were not a "captive audience" and had the burden of averting their eyes to avoid the offensive speech.
Analysis:
This landmark decision reinforces the stringent protections of the First Amendment, establishing that the government cannot prohibit speech solely because its content is offensive or hateful to the community. It clarifies the narrow scope of the "fighting words" doctrine, distinguishing between direct personal insults and general political expression, even when that expression uses symbols associated with genocide. The ruling highlights the principle that in a free society, the remedy for abhorrent speech is not censorship but rather the listener's ability to look away or engage in counter-speech. This case remains a definitive precedent against the "heckler's veto," ensuring that the threat of violence by opponents cannot be used to silence unpopular speakers.
