Vaughn v. Rosen
484 F.2d 820 (1973)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
When a government agency seeks to withhold documents requested under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), it cannot meet its statutory burden of proof with conclusory affidavits but must provide the court and the requesting party with a detailed justification, an itemized index, and a correlation of specific FOIA exemptions to the withheld portions of the documents.
Facts:
- The Civil Service Commission, through its Bureau of Personnel Management, evaluates the personnel management programs of various federal agencies.
- After each evaluation, the Bureau issues reports titled 'Evaluation of Personnel Management' which assess agency policies and provide recommendations.
- A law professor, Vaughn, who was conducting research on the Civil Service Commission, requested disclosure of these evaluations and other special reports under the FOIA.
- The Director of the Bureau of Personnel Management Evaluation denied Vaughn's request.
- The Executive Director of the Civil Service Commission affirmed the denial, asserting the documents were protected under three FOIA exemptions: (b)(2) internal agency rules, (b)(5) inter-agency memoranda, and (b)(6) personnel files.
Procedural Posture:
- Vaughn filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court seeking to enjoin the Civil Service Commission from withholding the requested documents.
- The Government filed a motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment, supported only by a conclusory affidavit from an agency director.
- The District Court (trial court) granted the Government's motion for summary judgment without providing a written opinion or reasons.
- Vaughn, as appellant, appealed the summary judgment ruling to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a government agency satisfy its statutory burden of proof under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to justify withholding documents by providing a conclusory affidavit that merely asserts the documents are covered by FOIA exemptions?
Opinions:
Majority - Wilkey, J.
No. A government agency does not satisfy its statutory burden of proof under FOIA by providing a conclusory affidavit; instead, it must submit a detailed justification and index to allow for meaningful judicial review. The FOIA places the burden on the government to prove that withheld documents are exempt from disclosure, and exemptions must be construed narrowly. The traditional adversary process breaks down in FOIA cases because the requesting party is unaware of the contents of the withheld documents, making it impossible to effectively challenge the government's claims of exemption. Relying on conclusory affidavits forces the court to either accept the government's claims without challenge or conduct a burdensome and inefficient in-camera review of potentially voluminous documents without the benefit of adversarial critique. This system encourages agencies to make broad, unsubstantiated claims of exemption. To remedy this, the court requires that agencies provide a detailed analysis that itemizes the documents, specifies which portions are exempt, and provides a justification correlating each claimed exemption with the specific part of the document it covers. This procedure restores the adversarial process and enables the court to effectively and efficiently evaluate the agency's claims.
Analysis:
This landmark decision fundamentally reshaped Freedom of Information Act litigation by creating a procedural requirement known as the 'Vaughn Index.' By requiring a detailed, indexed justification for withholdings, the court shifted the practical burden from the requester and the courts to the government agency. This levels the playing field, allowing requesters to challenge exemption claims with specificity and enabling judges to conduct meaningful de novo review without being overwhelmed by voluminous, unorganized documents. The Vaughn Index has become a standard, indispensable tool in virtually all FOIA cases, ensuring a more transparent and accountable process for challenging government secrecy.
Unlock the full brief for Vaughn v. Rosen