Lexplug logoLexplug

Urie v. Thompson, Trustee

Supreme Court of United States
337 U.S. 163 (1949)
ELI5:

Rule of Law:

The term 'injury' under the Federal Employers' Liability Act (FELA) and the Boiler Inspection Act (BIA) is not confined to accidental injuries but broadly encompasses occupational diseases, like silicosis, that are caused by an employer's negligence and develop over time.


Facts:

  • Tom Urie worked as a fireman on steam locomotives for the Missouri Pacific Railroad for approximately thirty years.
  • Throughout his employment, Urie continuously inhaled silica dust that was blown or sucked into the locomotive cabs where he worked.
  • The dust originated from sand with a high concentration of silica (80-90%) used in the locomotives' sanding equipment.
  • The railroad's locomotives had faultily adjusted 'sanders' that emitted excessive amounts of this sand onto the rails, which was then ground into fine dust.
  • Additionally, the locomotive cabs were in a state of disrepair, with cracks and openings in the floors that allowed more dust to enter.
  • In 1940, Urie was forced to cease working due to a pulmonary disease.
  • Shortly thereafter, his condition was diagnosed as silicosis, a permanently disabling lung affliction.

Procedural Posture:

  • Tom Urie sued Guy Thompson, trustee for the Missouri Pacific Railroad, in a Missouri state trial court under the Federal Employers' Liability Act (FELA).
  • The trial court sustained the railroad's demurrer, dismissing the complaint.
  • On Urie's first appeal, the Missouri Supreme Court held that while the complaint failed to state a claim for common law negligence under FELA, it did state a claim for a violation of the Boiler Inspection Act (BIA). The court reversed the dismissal and remanded for trial.
  • On remand, Urie amended his complaint to specifically allege BIA violations.
  • A jury found in favor of Urie and awarded him $30,000 in damages.
  • Thompson appealed the jury verdict to the Missouri Supreme Court for a second time.
  • The Missouri Supreme Court reversed the jury verdict, holding that the BIA is aimed at preventing accidental injuries and does not cover occupational diseases like silicosis.
  • The U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari to review the final judgment of the Missouri Supreme Court.

Locked

Premium Content

Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief

You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture

Issue:

Does the term 'injury' under the Federal Employers' Liability Act and the Boiler Inspection Act encompass occupational diseases like silicosis that develop gradually, or is its coverage limited to injuries resulting from accidents?


Opinions:

Majority - Mr. Justice Rutledge

Yes, the term 'injury' under the Federal Employers' Liability Act (FELA) and the Boiler Inspection Act (BIA) encompasses occupational diseases like silicosis. The court reasoned first that the statute of limitations for a latent occupational disease does not begin to run until the accumulated effects of the exposure manifest themselves and the employee discovers the injury. To hold otherwise would offer a 'delusive remedy.' Second, the Court found that Urie's original complaint sufficiently stated a cause of action for negligence under FELA, as the railroad knew or should have known that its use of high-silica sand with faulty equipment was dangerous, and compliance with industry custom is not a complete defense if the custom itself is inadequate. Third, the Court held that silicosis is an 'injury' under FELA, based on the statute's broad remedial language ('any person suffering injury'), its humanitarian purpose, and the absence of any legislative history to the contrary. Finally, the Court concluded that the BIA, which supplements FELA, does not narrow the scope of compensable injuries; it facilitates recovery by treating a violation of its safety standards as negligence per se, and thus an injury compensable for a BIA violation is coextensive with an injury under FELA.


Concurring - Mr. Justice Frankfurter

Yes, as to FELA; No, as to the Boiler Inspection Act. This opinion agrees that the term 'injury' in the Federal Employers' Liability Act is broad enough to include occupational diseases like silicosis when negligence is proven. However, it disagrees with the majority's conclusion regarding the Boiler Inspection Act, arguing that the BIA was intended to address injuries from 'accidents,' not gradually developing diseases. Applying the BIA to occupational diseases is a 'free-handed application' of a statute beyond its purpose, which may disservice the cause of promoting specific, comprehensive legislation to address the problem of occupational diseases.



Analysis:

This landmark decision significantly expanded the scope of recovery under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act by defining 'injury' to include occupational diseases, not just traumatic or accidental harms. It established a crucial precedent that a cause of action for a latent disease accrues upon manifestation and diagnosis, preventing the statute of limitations from barring claims before the victim is even aware of their illness. This ruling broadened carrier liability for unsafe, long-term working conditions and affirmed that safety statutes like the Boiler Inspection Act supplement, rather than restrict, the types of harms for which an employee can recover under FELA.

🤖 Gunnerbot:
Query Urie v. Thompson, Trustee (1949) directly. You can ask questions about any aspect of the case. If it's in the case, Gunnerbot will know.
Locked
Subscribe to Lexplug to chat with the Gunnerbot about this case.

Unlock the full brief for Urie v. Thompson, Trustee