United States v. Micah J. Gourde
2006 WL 574302, 440 F.3d 1065, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 5890 (2006)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
The Fourth Amendment requires that a search warrant not be issued without probable cause supported by Oath or affirmation. Probable cause exists when, under the totality of the circumstances, there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place.
Facts:
- Micah Gourde was a member of a website called 'Lolita-gurls.com' that contained both legal adult pornography and illegal child pornography.
- The website advertised pictures of young girls aged 12-17 and contained images of nude prepubescent females.
- Gourde paid $19.95 per month for a subscription to the website from November 2001 to January 2002.
- The FBI obtained a warrant to search Gourde's home and computer based on his membership and the website's content.
- The FBI had previously seized the website owner's computer, which contained records of subscriber activity.
- Over 100 images of child pornography were found on Gourde's computer after the search warrant was executed.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Did the affidavit provide sufficient probable cause to issue a search warrant for Gourde's computer under the Fourth Amendment?
Opinions:
Majority - McKeown (J.)
Yes, the affidavit provided sufficient probable cause to issue the search warrant. The totality of the circumstances, including the nature of the website and Gourde's paid membership, provided a fair probability that evidence of child pornography would be found on Gourde's computer. This is because Gourde took affirmative steps to join the website, which advertised and contained child pornography, and maintained his membership for over two months despite having the ability to cancel at any time. As a paying member, Gourde had unlimited access to hundreds of illegal images. His status as a member manifested his intention and desire to obtain illegal images. Additionally, the affidavit provided information about the habits of collectors of child pornography, suggesting that if Gourde had downloaded images, he likely still possessed them. The magistrate's decision to issue a warrant was based on a practical, common-sense determination supported by the facts presented in the affidavit.
Dissent - Reinhardt (J.)
No, because the government had direct evidence available that could confirm whether Gourde had downloaded illegal images and chose not to use it. The FBI had seized the website owner's computer, which contained records of subscriber activity, but failed to examine this evidence or mention it in the affidavit. This failure to use available dispositive evidence should have precluded the finding of probable cause. When the government's failure to examine the critical evidence is considered along with the limited information proffered in the affidavit, it cannot be said that there was a 'fair probability' that evidence of a crime would be found on Gourde's computer. The government's actions might fairly be said to have constituted 'conscious avoidance.'
Dissent - Kleinfeld (J.)
No, the mere subscription to a website containing both legal and illegal content does not automatically establish probable cause for possession of illegal content. The affidavit failed to demonstrate that Gourde had downloaded or intended to download such content. There was no evidence that Gourde was a 'collector' of child pornography, and the government did not provide any information from the seized website server about Gourde's download history. The majority's conclusion stacks inference upon inference until the conclusion is too weak to support the invasion of privacy entailed by a search warrant. The privacy of people's computers is too important to let it be eroded by sexual disgust, and probable cause seriously interpreted must remain a prerequisite for search warrants.
Analysis:
This case highlights the complexities involved in applying the Fourth Amendment's probable cause requirement in the digital age, particularly in cases involving child pornography. The majority opinion underscores a flexible, practical approach to probable cause, while the dissents emphasize the need for more concrete evidence before infringing on individual privacy. The case raises important questions about the balance between law enforcement needs and privacy rights in the context of internet-based crimes.
Unlock the full brief for United States v. Micah J. Gourde