United States v. Leviner
31 F.Supp.2d 23, 1998 WL 909980, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20323 (1998)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
For the purpose of sentence enhancement under the Felon in Possession of a Firearm statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), and its corresponding sentencing guideline, U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1, a 'prior felony conviction' must be a conviction that was finalized before the defendant committed the act of possessing the firearm.
Facts:
- Police officers observed a car in which Alexander Leviner was a passenger traveling at a high rate of speed and without headlights.
- The officers stopped the car and discovered that the vehicle's registration did not match the car.
- As a result of the registration issue, the officers asked Leviner and the other occupants to exit the vehicle.
- During the encounter, an officer found a holster on Leviner, who then fled but was apprehended almost immediately.
- Police found a 9 mm Smith and Wesson handgun on the car floor near where Leviner had been sitting.
- At the time of this incident, Leviner had one prior felony conviction.
- Two weeks after his arrest for firearm possession, Leviner was convicted of a separate felony for a drug offense.
Procedural Posture:
- Alexander Leviner was indicted in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, the federal trial court, on one count of Felon in Possession of a Firearm.
- Leviner filed a motion to suppress evidence, which the court denied.
- Following the denial of his motion, Leviner pled guilty to the charge.
- The case then proceeded to a sentencing hearing before the district court to determine the appropriate sentence.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a felony conviction that occurs after the defendant's illegal possession of a firearm count as a 'prior felony conviction' for the purpose of a sentence enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1 for a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1)?
Opinions:
Majority - Gertner, District Judge
No. A felony conviction obtained after the commission of the firearm possession offense cannot be counted as a 'prior felony conviction' for sentence enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1. The court's reasoning is grounded in statutory interpretation, the structure of the Sentencing Guidelines, and fundamental fairness. The statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), criminalizes possession by a person who 'has been convicted,' using the present perfect tense to denote a status that must be completed before the prohibited act of possession occurs, as established in Supreme Court precedent like Barrett v. United States. The Guidelines' structure separates 'Offense Conduct' (Chapter 2) from 'Criminal History' (Chapter 4); offense enhancements should relate to the defendant's status at the time of the crime, whereas subsequent convictions are relevant to the offender's overall history. To interpret the guideline commentary as including post-offense convictions would create an inconsistency with the statute itself, which is impermissible under Stinson v. United States.
Analysis:
This decision provides a crucial clarification on the temporal scope of 'prior convictions' for sentencing in felon-in-possession cases, firmly linking offense enhancements to the defendant's legal status at the moment the crime was committed. By distinguishing between the offense conduct and the offender's overall criminal history, the court reinforces a logical separation within the Sentencing Guidelines' structure. The opinion also creates a split with the reasoning of several other circuits, highlighting an area of federal sentencing law ripe for potential appellate clarification. Furthermore, the court's detailed analysis of the defendant's criminal history powerfully advocates for judicial discretion to depart from the Guidelines when their mechanical application may perpetuate racial disparities or overstate a defendant's actual culpability.
