Lexplug logoLexplug

United States v. Kirby Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of United States
284 U.S. 1 (1931)
ELI5:

Rule of Law:

A corporation realizes a taxable gain when it purchases its own bonds on the open market for a price less than the original issuing price, as this frees up assets previously offset by the full value of the debt.


Facts:

  • In July 1923, Kirby Lumber Company issued its own bonds, for which it received the par value of $12,126,800.
  • Later in the same year, Kirby Lumber Company purchased some of these same bonds back on the open market.
  • The price at which Kirby Lumber repurchased the bonds was less than the par value it received when issuing them.
  • The difference between the issuing price and the lower repurchase price was $137,521.30.

Procedural Posture:

  • Kirby Lumber Company filed its 1923 tax return excluding the $137,521.30 difference from its gross income.
  • The Commissioner of Internal Revenue determined this amount was taxable income and assessed a tax deficiency against the company.
  • Kirby Lumber Company sued the United States in the Court of Claims (a court of first instance for this type of claim) to recover the tax paid on this amount.
  • The Court of Claims ruled in favor of Kirby Lumber Company.
  • The United States (petitioner) appealed the decision to the Supreme Court of the United States.

Locked

Premium Content

Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief

You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture

Issue:

Does a corporation realize taxable income when it repurchases its own bonds on the open market for a price less than what it received when it issued them?


Opinions:

Majority - Mr. Justice Holmes

Yes. A corporation realizes taxable income when it repurchases its own bonds for less than their issuing price. The Revenue Act of 1921 defines gross income broadly to include 'gains or profits and income derived from any source whatever.' The court upheld the corresponding Treasury Regulation which explicitly states that the excess of the issuing price over the purchase price constitutes a taxable gain. The court distinguished this case from Bowers v. Kerbaugh-Empire Co., where an apparent gain from repaying a loan in devalued currency was not taxed because the overall transaction resulted in a net loss. Here, there was no 'shrinkage of assets'; rather, Kirby Lumber made a clear gain. By extinguishing a portion of its debt for less than face value, the company 'made available $137,521.30 assets previously offset by the obligation of bonds now extinct,' which constitutes a realized accession to income.



Analysis:

This landmark decision established the foundational principle of 'cancellation of indebtedness' income in U.S. tax law. It clarified that income is not limited to the receipt of cash or property but also includes any 'accession to wealth' or increase in net worth. The court's 'freeing of assets' theory means that when a liability is discharged for less than its face value, the taxpayer has effectively increased its net assets, and this increase is taxable. This principle has become a cornerstone of Internal Revenue Code § 61(a)(11) and continues to influence how debt forgiveness and restructuring are treated for tax purposes.

🤖 Gunnerbot:
Query United States v. Kirby Lumber Co. (1931) directly. You can ask questions about any aspect of the case. If it's in the case, Gunnerbot will know.
Locked
Subscribe to Lexplug to chat with the Gunnerbot about this case.

Unlock the full brief for United States v. Kirby Lumber Co.