United States v. Gotti
1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3159, 42 F. Supp. 2d 252, 1999 WL 151044 (1999)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
In complex, long-term investigations of an ongoing criminal enterprise, seemingly innocuous or disconnected activities may be considered together under the totality of the circumstances to establish probable cause for a wiretap or search warrant, and a reviewing court must grant substantial deference to the issuing judge's determination.
Facts:
- Federal and state law enforcement conducted a years-long investigation into the alleged Gambino Crime Family and its suspected leader, John A. Gotti.
- Between August and December 1995, surveillance recorded 32 phone calls from Gotti's home to City Auto Salvage, and 17 pages from City Auto's phone to the pager of co-defendant Craig DePalma.
- Gotti and his associates were observed using several locations for meetings, including the Bergin Hunt and Fish Club, City Auto Salvage, and a storefront at 97-11 Sutphin Boulevard.
- A cooperating witness informed investigators that he had received large cash loans from Gotti, which were retrieved by an associate, Michael McLaughlin, from a location near the Bergin Club, and that the cash had a musty smell as if it had been stored in a damp or underground location.
- Investigators learned that Gotti owned and operated a prepaid calling card business, Nicodan Telecommunications, from his office at 97-11 Sutphin Boulevard.
- During visits to his incarcerated father at the federal prison in Marion, Illinois, John A. Gotti signed "Notification to Visitor" forms acknowledging that the visiting area could be monitored for security purposes.
- Law enforcement searched a basement at 106-13 101st Avenue, Queens, a property associated with Gotti's associates, and recovered approximately $358,000 in cash, lists of alleged organized crime members, and several firearms.
Procedural Posture:
- Defendants John A. Gotti and others were charged in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York with racketeering, conspiracy, and other federal offenses.
- Prior to trial, the defendants filed a series of omnibus pretrial motions.
- Gotti moved to suppress the fruits of electronic surveillance conducted between 1994 and 1997, arguing the warrant applications lacked sufficient probable cause.
- Gotti also moved to suppress evidence from a February 1997 search of a basement, arguing the warrant was tainted by a prior illegal search and was facially defective.
- Gotti and another defendant moved to suppress evidence from an October 1997 search of Nicodan Telecommunications, arguing the warrant was overbroad.
- Gotti moved to suppress audio and video recordings of conversations with his father at a federal prison, arguing they were obtained in violation of Title III and the Constitution.
- The district court held a hearing on the defendants' suppression motions.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does the Fourth Amendment require suppression of evidence obtained from wiretaps and physical searches when the supporting affidavits, viewed under the totality of the circumstances and with deference to the issuing judge, provide a substantial basis for a finding of probable cause that an ongoing criminal enterprise is being conducted?
Opinions:
Majority - Barrington D. Parker, Jr.
No. The Fourth Amendment does not require suppression of the evidence because, viewing the constellation of evidence in the practical, common-sense fashion the law requires, the issuing judge had a substantial basis to conclude that ongoing organized criminal activity was occurring. The court must afford substantial deference to an issuing judge's determination of probable cause, resolving any doubts in favor of upholding the warrant. Under the 'totality of the circumstances' test from Illinois v. Gates, affidavits supporting a warrant must be read in their entirety, with each fact gaining color from the others. Seemingly innocuous conversations and activities, when placed in the context of an extensive investigation into an organized criminal enterprise, can collectively establish probable cause. Furthermore, where affidavits present a picture of continuing criminal conduct, information that might otherwise be considered stale remains relevant. Even if probable cause were lacking, the evidence would not be suppressed under the good faith exception of United States v. Leon, as the officers' reliance on the facially valid warrants was objectively reasonable. Finally, the prison recordings are admissible because the inmate's use of monitored telephones after being notified constitutes implied consent under Title III, and visitors have no reasonable expectation of privacy in a prison visiting area.
Analysis:
This decision reinforces the significant latitude granted to law enforcement and issuing magistrates in complex organized crime investigations. It underscores that the 'totality of the circumstances' test allows courts to find probable cause by piecing together numerous non-criminal acts, provided they are contextualized by evidence of a larger criminal enterprise. The case also confirms the broad applicability of the Leon good faith exception to both physical searches and electronic surveillance, creating a high bar for defendants seeking to suppress evidence obtained via warrant. The opinion serves as a practical blueprint for how investigators can incrementally build a case, using evidence from one warrant to justify subsequent and more intrusive surveillance.
