United States v. Devon Roche
2005 WL 1618816, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 13947, 415 F. 3d 614 (2005)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A defendant's knowing and voluntary waiver of appellate rights in a plea agreement is enforceable and precludes appeals on grounds not specifically reserved, even if those grounds are based on an unforeseen change in the law that occurred after the agreement was made.
Facts:
- During the summer of 2000, Devon Roche sold ecstasy to Derrick Perkins on three separate occasions.
- Prior to each sale, Roche used a telephone to communicate with Perkins to arrange the transaction.
- Separately, between 1998 and 2000, Roche was the leader of a criminal organization that smuggled more than 120,000 ecstasy tablets from Amsterdam to Chicago.
- Prosecutors offered Roche a plea bargain where they would dismiss charges related to the large-scale smuggling operation if he pleaded guilty to three counts of using a telephone to facilitate a drug crime.
- Roche accepted the plea bargain, which included a provision where he waived his right to appeal his sentence on any ground.
- The waiver agreement specifically reserved Roche's right to appeal on only four grounds: 1) the court's relevant conduct determination, 2) the total weight of the ecstasy, 3) any aggravating role enhancement, and 4) any upward departure from his offense level.
Procedural Posture:
- Devon Roche was charged with federal drug offenses.
- Roche entered into a plea agreement with the government, pleading guilty in the U.S. District Court to three counts of using a telecommunications device to facilitate the distribution of a controlled substance.
- The district court judge conducted a sentencing hearing, made factual findings regarding relevant conduct and drug quantity, and imposed a sentence.
- Roche appealed his sentence to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a defendant's waiver of their right to appeal their sentence, with specific and limited exceptions, preclude them from raising a new legal argument based on an unforeseen change in the law (like the U.S. v. Booker decision) that falls outside those reserved exceptions?
Opinions:
Majority - Easterbrook, Circuit Judge.
Yes. A defendant's waiver of appeal rights in a plea agreement prevents them from raising arguments that fall outside the scope of specifically reserved issues. The court reasoned that a plea agreement is a contract where the defendant receives a substantial benefit (here, the dismissal of major smuggling charges) in exchange for waiving certain rights. Roche's waiver broadly covered appeals "on any ground" other than the four listed, and his argument based on the subsequent U.S. v. Booker decision constitutes a different legal "ground" that was not reserved. The court held that the fact that Booker was unforeseen does not invalidate the waiver, as Roche agreed to give up the right to challenge his sentence on any basis, "foreseen or not." The court noted this conclusion is consistent with its own precedent and that of at least nine other circuits, which have held there is nothing unique about Booker that precludes the enforcement of a valid appeal waiver.
Analysis:
This decision reinforces the finality and enforceability of appellate waivers in federal plea agreements. It establishes that such waivers will be strictly construed and will bar even arguments based on significant, intervening changes in constitutional law like U.S. v. Booker. The ruling solidifies the principle that a general waiver of appellate rights encompasses all grounds not explicitly reserved, including those that are unforeseen at the time of the plea. For future cases, this holding strengthens the government's bargaining power in plea negotiations and limits defendants' ability to later challenge sentences by taking advantage of favorable legal developments that occur after their conviction.
