United States v. Dennis Rodriguez and Jennifer West
761 F.2d 1339, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 31237 (1985)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
Mere proximity to contraband, presence on a property where it is found, or association with a person who controls it is insufficient to establish constructive possession. The government must prove the defendant knew of the contraband and had the power to exercise dominion and control over it.
Facts:
- Police were investigating a robbery at a motel and knocked on the door of the room occupied by Dennis Rodriguez and Jennifer West.
- West opened the door and consented to the police officers' entry.
- Upon entering, police observed Rodriguez lying on the bed in casual attire.
- The room contained various items used for counterfeiting, including coffee grounds, dye, a stained glove, and a stained dishrag.
- While police were present, West moved various items around the room, attempting to cover up the materials and hide a paper bag.
- The paper bag West tried to hide was later found to contain eighty-seven counterfeit twenty-dollar bills.
- An officer also observed partially dyed twenty-dollar bills drying on the bathroom counter.
- No evidence was presented to show that Rodriguez had rented the room or that any of the items in the room belonged to him.
Procedural Posture:
- Dennis Rodriguez and Jennifer West were charged in a U.S. District Court with possession of counterfeit bills with intent to defraud.
- Following a trial, a jury found both Rodriguez and West guilty of the charges.
- Rodriguez and West, as appellants, appealed their convictions to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
- The United States is the appellee.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Is a defendant's mere presence in a room containing contraband and counterfeiting materials, without any other evidence connecting the defendant to those items, sufficient to prove constructive possession required for a conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 472?
Opinions:
Majority - Schroeder, Circuit Judge
No. A defendant's mere presence in a room with contraband is insufficient to prove constructive possession. To establish constructive possession, the government must demonstrate that the defendant both knew of the presence of the contraband and had the power to exercise dominion and control over it. The evidence against Rodriguez showed only his presence in the room and his ability to observe the contraband, which is legally insufficient. Precedent like Delgado v. United States establishes that where it is 'pure speculation' which of two people in a room possessed contraband, a conviction cannot stand. In contrast, the evidence against West was sufficient because she exercised actual dominion and control over the materials by actively trying to conceal them from the police.
Analysis:
This decision reinforces the legal principle that guilt is individual and cannot be established by mere association or proximity to criminal activity. It clarifies the high evidentiary bar for proving constructive possession in cases involving shared premises, requiring prosecutors to present specific, affirmative evidence linking a defendant to the contraband beyond their simple presence. The ruling protects individuals from being convicted simply for being in the 'wrong place at the wrong time' and forces the government to demonstrate a concrete connection showing a defendant's power and intent to control illegal items.
Unlock the full brief for United States v. Dennis Rodriguez and Jennifer West