United States v. Dennis Blane Gwinn
219 F.3d 326, 2000 WL 966029, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 16113 (2000)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
An officer's warrantless reentry into an arrestee's home to retrieve clothing is justified under the exigent circumstances exception to the Fourth Amendment when there is an objective need to protect the arrestee from a substantial risk of injury or harm.
Facts:
- Anna Terry called 911 to report that her daughter's boyfriend, Dennis Gwinn, was at his trailer with a gun and had threatened to kill her daughter, Diane Harrah.
- Terry informed the dispatcher that Harrah and her baby were in the trailer with Gwinn.
- When State Trooper Ron Thomas arrived at the remote trailer location, he ordered Gwinn to come outside.
- Gwinn exited the trailer wearing only a pair of blue jeans, without a shirt or shoes.
- After arresting Gwinn, Trooper Thomas entered the trailer and spoke with Harrah, who was crying and holding her baby.
- Harrah confirmed that Gwinn, who was drunk, had brandished a pistol and threatened to kill her if she tried to leave.
- As officers prepared to transport Gwinn to jail, they noted he was barefoot and shirtless on a cloudy May evening.
Procedural Posture:
- Dennis Gwinn was charged in federal district court with being a felon in possession of a firearm.
- Gwinn filed a motion to suppress the handgun found in his boot, arguing it was obtained through an unconstitutional warrantless search of his trailer.
- The district court denied the motion to suppress the handgun, ruling that the officer's reentry was justified under a general standard of reasonableness.
- Gwinn entered a conditional guilty plea, which preserved his right to appeal the district court's ruling on the suppression motion.
- Gwinn, as the appellant, appealed the district court's decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a police officer's warrantless reentry into an arrestee's home to retrieve clothing, made to protect the arrestee from potential harm due to being partially clothed, violate the Fourth Amendment's prohibition against unreasonable searches?
Opinions:
Majority - Judge Niemeyer
No. A police officer's warrantless reentry into an arrestee's home does not violate the Fourth Amendment when the arrestee's partially clothed status creates an exigency justifying the limited entry to retrieve clothing to protect the arrestee from a substantial risk of harm. The court rejected the district court's use of a general reasonableness test, affirming that a warrantless search of a home is per se unreasonable unless a specific exception, such as exigent circumstances, applies. Here, the officers had a duty to ensure the safety of a person in their custody. Given that Gwinn was arrested barefoot and shirtless in a remote area on a cool evening, there was a substantial risk of injury to his feet and harm from the cold. The court established a 'clothing exigency' exception, which applies when the reentry is not pretextual, the intrusion is minimal and strictly limited to the purpose of retrieving clothing, and the officer's motive is to protect the arrestee's well-being, not to conduct a search for evidence. This limited action is distinct from a law enforcement search and is supported by the 'community caretaking' rationale, as officers were addressing a potential safety hazard for a person under their control.
Analysis:
This decision establishes a 'clothing exigency' exception to the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement in the Fourth Circuit, creating a narrow rule for a specific set of circumstances. It balances the high constitutional protection of the home against the practical duty of law enforcement to ensure the safety of individuals in their custody. By providing a multi-factor test, the court gives guidance to lower courts but also cautions against using this exception as a pretext for investigatory searches. The ruling will likely influence how police handle arrests of partially clothed individuals and will require the government to demonstrate a genuine and substantial safety need to justify such a warrantless entry in future cases.
Unlock the full brief for United States v. Dennis Blane Gwinn