United States v. Czubinski
106 F.3d 1069 (1997)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
Unauthorized access and viewing of confidential government information, without evidence of further use or a clear intent to use that information for a private purpose, is insufficient to constitute a 'scheme to defraud' under the wire fraud statute or the 'obtaining of anything of value' under the computer fraud statute.
Facts:
- Richard Czubinski was an employee of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) with authorized access to the Integrated Data Retrieval System (IDRS), a computer system containing taxpayer information.
- IRS rules strictly prohibited employees from accessing computer files for non-official purposes.
- In 1992, Czubinski conducted numerous unauthorized searches of the IDRS, viewing the confidential tax information of various individuals.
- The targets of his searches included members of a political campaign, an assistant district attorney who was prosecuting his father, a political opponent, and personal acquaintances.
- Czubinski was a member of the Ku Klux Klan, and an acquaintance testified that Czubinski once stated an intention to use taxpayer information to 'build dossiers' on people in the white supremacist movement.
- There was no evidence that Czubinski ever printed, recorded, disclosed, or otherwise used any of the confidential information he viewed.
Procedural Posture:
- In June 1995, a grand jury indicted Richard Czubinski on ten counts of wire fraud and four counts of computer fraud in the United States District Court.
- Czubinski filed several pre-trial motions, including a motion to dismiss the indictment, all of which were denied by the district court.
- The case proceeded to a jury trial.
- At the close of the government's evidence, Czubinski filed a motion for judgment of acquittal on all counts.
- The district court granted the motion as to one count of wire fraud but denied it for the remaining thirteen counts.
- The jury returned a guilty verdict on the thirteen remaining counts.
- Czubinski, as the appellant, appealed the judgment of the district court to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a government employee's unauthorized browsing of confidential computer files, without any evidence that the employee used or disclosed the information, constitute a scheme to defraud under the federal wire fraud statute or the obtaining of something of value under the federal computer fraud statute?
Opinions:
Majority - Torruella, C.J.
No. A conviction for wire or computer fraud cannot be sustained by an employee's unauthorized browsing of confidential files alone; the government must prove the defendant intended to deprive the owner of property or honest services through a 'use' of that information, which was not shown here. For a wire fraud conviction based on deprivation of property, the government must show either articulable harm to the property owner or that the defendant intended a 'gainful use' of the information. Here, the government failed to prove Czubinski intended to use the information, as his single comment about 'dossiers' was never acted upon, and no information was ever recorded or disclosed. Similarly, for honest services fraud, the government must show the misconduct was intended to subvert the impartial performance of official duties for a private gain, not merely that the employee violated workplace rules. Czubinski's actions, while inappropriate, did not involve bribery, embezzlement, or a failure to perform his job, and thus do not rise to the level of honest services fraud. Finally, for the computer fraud charge, merely viewing information does not constitute 'obtaining anything of value' under the statute, which requires more than just the 'use of the computer' and is intended to punish theft of information, not mere unauthorized access.
Analysis:
This decision significantly limits the scope of federal fraud statutes as applied to employee misconduct involving unauthorized access to computer systems. It establishes a critical distinction between mere browsing or violating workplace rules and the commission of a federal felony. The court's holding requires prosecutors to provide concrete evidence of fraudulent intent, specifically an intent to use the accessed information for a private purpose, thereby preventing the statutes from becoming a 'draconian personnel regulation.' This precedent protects employees who are merely curious from felony charges and clarifies that the 'harm' in such cases must be more than the simple breach of a confidentiality rule.
Unlock the full brief for United States v. Czubinski