United States v. Bass
2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 23498, 661 F.3d 1299, 2011 WL 5868350 (2011)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
Under the Fourth Amendment, a warrantless search of a closed, unlocked container is permissible if police obtain consent from a third party whom they reasonably believe has common authority over the premises and the container, based on the totality of the circumstances.
Facts:
- Christopher Bass lived in a trailer with his girlfriend, Jessica Ramsey.
- Police began surveillance of the trailer after receiving a tip.
- After observing Bass leave the residence, police followed and arrested him for possessing drug paraphernalia and methamphetamine found in his vehicle.
- Officers returned to the trailer and were met by Ramsey, who told them she lived there with Bass.
- Ramsey, though initially hesitant, became cooperative upon learning Bass was in custody, expressing relief because he had been verbally abusive.
- Police informed Ramsey they were looking for illegal items and she orally consented to a search of the entire trailer.
- During the search of the living room, an officer found a black leather zipper bag on the floor.
- The officer opened the unlocked bag and discovered a revolver inside.
Procedural Posture:
- Christopher Bass was charged in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado with two counts of being a felon in possession of a firearm.
- Bass filed a motion to suppress the revolver found in the zipper bag, arguing his girlfriend's consent to the search was not voluntary and she lacked authority.
- The district court (the trial court of first instance) denied the motion to suppress.
- A jury convicted Bass on the count related to the revolver but acquitted him on the count related to two other rifles.
- The district court imposed a sentence of 94 months, which included enhancements for conduct related to the acquitted charge.
- Bass, as appellant, appealed his conviction and sentence to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, challenging the denial of his suppression motion.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a cohabiting girlfriend have apparent authority to consent to a warrantless search of her boyfriend's unlocked zipper bag located in a common area of their shared residence?
Opinions:
Majority - Hartz, Circuit Judge
Yes, a cohabiting girlfriend has apparent authority to consent to the search of her boyfriend's unlocked bag in a common area. Apparent authority exists when police officers have a reasonable belief that the consenting party possesses common authority over the property to be searched. This common authority rests on mutual use and joint access, meaning the defendant has 'assumed the risk' that the co-inhabitant might permit a search. Here, the officers reasonably believed Ramsey had such authority because she told them she lived in the trailer with Bass, their intimate relationship implied a significant sacrifice of individual privacy, and the unlocked zipper bag was in a common area (the living room), showing no special steps taken to protect its privacy. The court distinguished this from a host-guest relationship, finding that within a cohabiting partnership, there is a stronger presumption of shared access and control over items in common areas.
Analysis:
This decision reinforces the doctrine of apparent authority in third-party consent searches, particularly within intimate, cohabiting relationships. It lowers the investigative burden on police, allowing them to rely on a partner's consent to search unlocked containers in common areas without needing to confirm ownership or exclusive use. The ruling suggests that individuals in such relationships have a diminished expectation of privacy in their belongings left in shared spaces. Future cases will likely use this precedent to validate searches based on a cohabitant's consent, unless the defendant took 'special steps,' such as locking the container, to signal an expectation of privacy.
