United States of America v. Ricardo Pablo Barron
472 F.2d 1215 (1973)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
An officer's observation of a vehicle riding unusually low at a fixed border checkpoint can provide sufficient reasonable suspicion to justify a brief investigatory stop. Subsequent suspicious actions by the driver, such as flight, can ripen this reasonable suspicion into probable cause for a search.
Facts:
- Around 1:40 a.m., Ricardo P. Barron was driving alone in a 1963 Oldsmobile when he approached the Border Patrol checkpoint in San Clemente, California.
- A Border Patrol agent observed that Barron's car was riding low in the rear, but noticed nothing in the back seat to account for the apparent weight.
- Based on this observation, the agent directed Barron to pull into a secondary inspection area.
- Barron initially slowed down as if to comply but then suddenly accelerated and sped away from the checkpoint.
- Approximately half a mile north of the checkpoint, Barron abandoned his still-moving vehicle and fled on foot.
- An agent who entered Barron's vehicle to stop it from rolling detected a very strong odor of marijuana inside.
- Another agent found Barron lying face down in a ditch about fifty yards away.
- After bringing Barron back to the checkpoint, agents opened the car's trunk and discovered it was filled with kilo bricks of marijuana.
Procedural Posture:
- Ricardo P. Barron was prosecuted in federal trial court for possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute.
- Following a trial, a judgment of conviction was entered against Barron.
- Barron, as the appellant, appealed his conviction to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does the initial stop of a vehicle at a fixed border checkpoint, based on the observation that the car is riding low in the rear, constitute an unconstitutional seizure under the Fourth Amendment?
Opinions:
Majority - Per Curiam
No, the initial stop of a vehicle at a fixed border checkpoint, based on the observation that the car is riding low, does not constitute an unconstitutional seizure. The court held that it is constitutionally permissible for officers to briefly detain persons for limited inquiry under circumstances that may not justify a full arrest. The government has a significant interest in preventing the illegal entry of aliens, and the checkpoint was located on a major highway known for such activity. The agent's observation of an older model car riding low late at night provided enough reasonable suspicion for a brief investigatory stop. From that point, probable cause developed rapidly and indisputably through Barron's subsequent actions. Barron's flight, abandoning a moving car, and attempting to hide provided probable cause to search for aliens. Furthermore, the strong odor of marijuana detected by an agent was, by itself, sufficient to establish probable cause for a search for contraband.
Analysis:
This decision reinforces the doctrine that reasonable suspicion, a standard lower than probable cause, is sufficient for brief, investigatory stops, particularly at fixed border checkpoints where the government's interest is high. The case serves as a clear example of how a chain of events can escalate an officer's suspicion from an initial, minimal observation to full probable cause. It demonstrates that a suspect's evasive actions, such as flight, are powerful factors in the 'totality of the circumstances' analysis for probable cause. This ruling helps distinguish the lower constitutional threshold for stops at fixed checkpoints from the higher standard required for random, roving patrol stops.
