Union Planters Bank, NA v. Peninsula Bank
2005 WL 419518, 897 So. 2d 499 (2005)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A security interest in a motor vehicle must be perfected by notation on the certificate of title as required by state title statutes. The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) exception for perfecting an interest in 'inventory held for sale' does not apply to a business, such as a car rental company, whose primary operation is renting vehicles, even if it regularly sells its used vehicles as an incidental part of its business.
Facts:
- InterAmerican Car Rental, Inc. (InterAmerican) operated a short-term car rental business.
- InterAmerican regularly sold its used rental vehicles after nine to ten months of use, selling approximately 4,000 vehicles per year.
- These sales, conducted through wholesale auctions or directly to wholesalers and dealers, accounted for 60-70% of InterAmerican's revenue.
- InterAmerican was not a licensed motor vehicle dealer and never advertised or sold vehicles directly to the public.
- Union Planters Bank, Ocean Bank, and Peninsula Bank all extended loans to InterAmerican, secured by its vehicle fleet.
- Union Planters Bank attempted to perfect its security interest by filing UCC-1 financing statements.
- Ocean Bank and Peninsula Bank perfected their security interests by having their liens noted on the individual vehicle certificates of title.
- In 2002, InterAmerican defaulted on its loans, leading to a dispute among the creditors over who had priority to the vehicles.
Procedural Posture:
- Ocean Bank and Peninsula Bank brought an action against InterAmerican in a Florida trial court to enforce their liens on the company's vehicles.
- Union Planters Bank intervened in the lawsuit, claiming its security interest had priority over the other banks.
- The trial court granted final summary judgment in favor of Ocean Bank and Peninsula Bank, holding their liens had priority.
- The trial court also denied Union Planters Bank's cross-motion for summary judgment.
- Union Planters Bank, as appellant, appealed the trial court's judgment to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a creditor perfect its security interest in a car rental company's vehicle fleet by filing a UCC-1 financing statement under the 'inventory held for sale' exception, when the company's primary business is renting vehicles and its sale of used vehicles is incidental to that business?
Opinions:
Majority - Rothenberg, J.
No. A creditor does not perfect its security interest in a car rental company's vehicles by filing a UCC-1 financing statement because such vehicles do not qualify as 'inventory held for sale' when the company's primary business is renting, not selling. The court held that Chapter 319, Florida Statutes, which mandates that liens be noted on a vehicle's certificate of title, provides the exclusive method for perfecting a security interest in this context. The UCC exception in section 679.3111(4) for 'inventory held for sale by a person... in business of selling goods of that kind' is inapplicable. The court reasoned that InterAmerican was fundamentally in the car rental business, and its sale of used vehicles was merely incidental to its primary operation—disposing of assets that had lost their usefulness. The fact that these sales generated significant revenue did not change the nature of the business. The court found that InterAmerican's conduct fell within the statutory exemption for businesses 'disposing of vehicles acquired for their own use or for use in their business,' and was therefore not a 'motor vehicle dealer.'
Analysis:
This decision clarifies the line between perfecting security interests under a state's motor vehicle title statute versus the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). It establishes that the primary purpose of a business, not its incidental activities, determines whether its assets qualify as 'inventory held for sale' under the UCC. The ruling provides critical guidance for lenders to asset-heavy businesses like rental companies, reinforcing that notation on the certificate of title is the mandatory and exclusive method for perfecting liens on their vehicles. This precedent strengthens the integrity of state title systems and limits the scope of the UCC's inventory exception, preventing its application to businesses that are merely disposing of used capital goods.
Gunnerbot
AI-powered case assistant
Loaded: Union Planters Bank, NA v. Peninsula Bank (2005)
Try: "What was the holding?" or "Explain the dissent"