Turner v. Commissioner
1954 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 207, 1954 T.C. Memo. 38, 13 T.C.M. 462 (1954)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
The taxable value of a non-transferable prize is not its retail cost but its fair market value to the specific taxpayer, considering the taxpayer's personal circumstances, the restrictions on the prize's use, and the actual economic benefit derived.
Facts:
- Reginald Turner's name was randomly selected from a telephone book for a radio quiz show.
- On April 18, 1948, Turner was called by the show and correctly identified two songs, winning a grand prize.
- The prize consisted of two non-transferable, first-class, round-trip steamship tickets for a cruise between New York City and Buenos Aires, with a retail value of $2,220.
- The tickets were only valid for one year and on a sailing date approved by the steamship company's agent.
- Marie Turner, Reginald's wife, was a native of Brazil.
- The Turners negotiated with the steamship company to exchange the two first-class tickets.
- For an additional payment of $12.50, they received four round-trip tourist-class tickets between New York City and Rio de Janeiro.
- The Turners and their two sons used these four tickets to take a family trip to Rio de Janeiro and return during 1948.
Procedural Posture:
- The petitioners, Reginald and Marie Turner, filed a joint income tax return for 1948.
- On their return, they reported $520 as income from the award of the two steamship tickets.
- The Commissioner of Internal Revenue issued a notice of deficiency, increasing the income from the tickets to their retail price of $2,220.
- The Turners petitioned the United States Tax Court to contest the Commissioner's deficiency determination.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
For income tax purposes, is the value of a non-transferable prize its full retail price, or is it a lower, subjective value based on what the prize is worth to the specific taxpayer?
Opinions:
Majority - Murdock, J.
No. The value of a non-transferable prize is not its full retail price but rather a lower amount reflecting its subjective value to the taxpayer. The court reasoned that the Turners would not have purchased such tickets in the ordinary course of their lives, as the cruise was a luxury beyond their means. Therefore, the value of the tickets to them was not equal to the retail cost. The court also emphasized the tickets' non-transferable and non-salable nature, which limited their convertibility to cash. However, because the Turners did derive a substantial economic benefit—a family trip with free board and savings on living expenses—a significant amount must be included in their income. Acknowledging the difficulty in valuation with meager evidence, the court determined the fair value of the benefit received by the Turners to be $1,400.
Analysis:
This case is significant for establishing the principle of subjective valuation for non-monetary, non-transferable prizes in tax law. It deviates from a rigid standard of using retail price as fair market value, allowing courts to consider the recipient's specific circumstances and the prize's inherent limitations. This decision introduced flexibility into valuation, making it a fact-intensive inquiry, but it also created uncertainty for taxpayers and the IRS. The case serves as a key precedent that 'value' for tax purposes can mean the value to the specific individual, not necessarily the objective market price, especially when an item cannot be easily converted to cash.
