Trebilcock v. Commissioner
1975 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 88, 64 T.C. 852 (1975)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
Payments for services that provide inherently personal benefits, such as spiritual guidance, are non-deductible personal expenses under IRC § 262, even if they indirectly improve a business owner's performance. For a business expense to be deductible under IRC § 162(a), it must be "ordinary," meaning it is a normal, usual, or customary expense in the taxpayer's specific type of business.
Facts:
- During 1969 and 1970, Lionel Trebilcock was the sole proprietor of Litco Products, a wood products brokerage.
- Trebilcock employed Rev. James Wardrop, an ordained minister, paying him $7,020 per year.
- Wardrop's primary duties were to minister spiritually to Trebilcock and his employees, which included conducting prayer meetings and providing counseling on business and personal problems.
- When offering advice on business matters, Wardrop did not rely on business expertise, which he lacked, but instead proposed answers he believed were received through prayer.
- In addition to his spiritual duties, Wardrop also performed some secular, business-related tasks such as visiting sawmills with Trebilcock, running errands, and mailing materials.
- On his 1969 and 1970 income tax returns, Trebilcock deducted the full $7,020 paid to Wardrop each year as a business expense.
Procedural Posture:
- Lionel Trebilcock filed joint income tax returns for 1969 and 1970, claiming a business expense deduction for payments to Rev. Wardrop.
- The Commissioner of Internal Revenue (Respondent) disallowed the deductions and determined deficiencies in Trebilcock's income tax for both years.
- Trebilcock (Petitioner) challenged the Commissioner's determination by filing a petition in the United States Tax Court.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Are payments made by a sole proprietor to a minister for spiritual guidance, prayer meetings, counseling, and various secular business tasks deductible in their entirety as an ordinary and necessary business expense under IRC § 162(a)?
Opinions:
Majority - Wiles, Judge
No, the payments are not deductible in their entirety. Payments for services that are inherently personal in nature, such as spiritual guidance and counseling, are not 'ordinary and necessary' business expenses under § 162(a) and are disallowed by § 262. Only the portion of the payments attributable to secular business-related tasks is deductible. The court found that the benefits derived from Wardrop's prayer meetings and spiritual counseling were inherently personal, similar to the services provided in Fred W. Amend Co. v. Commissioner, and therefore non-deductible. The court also held that counseling on business problems was not an 'ordinary' expense because the method used—deriving solutions from prayer—was not proven to be normal or customary in the wood brokerage business. However, the payments for secular tasks like running errands were deductible. Lacking a specific allocation, the court applied the Cohan rule to estimate that $1,000 of the annual salary was for deductible business services, disallowing the remaining $6,020.
Analysis:
This case reinforces the firm distinction between deductible business expenses (§ 162) and non-deductible personal expenses (§ 262), especially for services with intangible benefits. It establishes that an expense's character is determined by the nature of the service provided, not its indirect effect on the taxpayer's business acumen or well-being. The decision clarifies that the taxpayer bears the burden of proving an expense is 'ordinary' for their specific industry, suggesting that unconventional business practices will face high scrutiny. This precedent limits the ability of business owners to deduct expenses for services that primarily enhance their personal or spiritual life, even if they believe those services improve their professional performance.
