Tolan v. Cotton
572 U. S. ____ (2014) (2014)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
When ruling on a motion for summary judgment, a court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party and draw all justifiable inferences in that party's favor, a rule that applies with equal force in qualified immunity cases.
Facts:
- Police officer John Edwards mistyped the license plate of a vehicle driven by Robert Tolan, causing his computer to wrongly identify it as stolen.
- Edwards drew his pistol and ordered Tolan and his cousin, Anthony Cooper, to lie face-down on the porch of the house they had parked in front of, which was Tolan's family home.
- Tolan's parents came outside and explained to Edwards that they owned the home and the car, and that Tolan was their son.
- Sergeant Jeffrey Cotton arrived as backup, drew his pistol, and ordered Tolan's mother to stand against the garage door.
- A dispute occurred between Cotton and Tolan's mother, with Tolan's family testifying that Cotton slammed her against the garage door, causing bruises.
- Upon seeing the interaction, Tolan, who was on the ground, exclaimed, "Get your fucking hands off my mom."
- There is a factual dispute as to whether Tolan rose to his knees or to his feet in a 'charging position' when he spoke.
- Cotton, without a verbal warning, fired three shots at Tolan from 15-20 feet away, hitting him once in the chest while Tolan was unarmed.
Procedural Posture:
- Robert Tolan and his family sued Sergeant Cotton in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas for claims including excessive force under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
- Cotton moved for summary judgment, asserting the defense of qualified immunity.
- The District Court granted summary judgment to Cotton, holding that his use of force was not unreasonable and thus did not violate the Fourth Amendment.
- Tolan, the appellant, appealed the decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, with Cotton as the appellee.
- The Fifth Circuit affirmed the summary judgment on different grounds, holding that even if Cotton's conduct violated the Fourth Amendment, he was entitled to qualified immunity because he did not violate a clearly established right.
- Tolan then petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a court misapply the summary judgment standard in a qualified immunity case by failing to view the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party and resolving disputed material facts in favor of the moving party?
Opinions:
Majority - Per Curiam
Yes. A court misapplies the summary judgment standard by resolving genuine disputes of fact in favor of the party seeking summary judgment. The Fifth Circuit improperly credited the evidence of Cotton, the moving party, and failed to properly acknowledge key evidence offered by Tolan, the party opposing the motion. The court made its own factual inferences regarding the lighting on the porch, the demeanor of Tolan's mother, the nature of Tolan's words, and Tolan's physical positioning, despite contradictory testimony from Tolan and his family. The fundamental principle of summary judgment is that a judge's function is not to weigh the evidence and determine the truth of the matter but to determine whether there is a genuine issue for trial. By resolving these factual disputes in Cotton's favor, the Fifth Circuit failed to adhere to this principle.
Concurring - Justice Alito
Yes. While agreeing that summary judgment should not have been granted because genuine issues of material fact exist, this case represents mere error correction and is not the type of case the Supreme Court should typically grant for review. The courts of appeals are not confused about the proper summary judgment standard, and the lower court's error was a misapplication of that standard, not a misunderstanding of it. Granting certiorari in such a fact-bound case sets a precedent that could substantially alter the Court's practice of hearing only cases with compelling legal questions rather than correcting routine evidentiary errors.
Analysis:
This case serves as a forceful reminder to lower courts of the strict procedural requirements for granting summary judgment, particularly in the context of qualified immunity for police officers. By summarily reversing the Fifth Circuit, the Supreme Court signaled that appellate courts cannot shortcut the analysis by adopting the officer's version of disputed events when determining whether a right was 'clearly established.' The decision reinforces the jury's role as the ultimate fact-finder and makes it more difficult for defendants to win qualified immunity at the summary judgment stage if the plaintiff can produce competent evidence creating a genuine dispute over material facts.
Unlock the full brief for Tolan v. Cotton