Tinney v. Tinney
799 A.2d 235, 2002 WL 1022975, 2002 R.I. LEXIS 131 (2002)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
Under Rhode Island law, a person legally adopted as an adult has the same right to inherit from an adoptive parent who dies intestate as a person adopted during their minority or a biological child.
Facts:
- Ruth E. Tinney was eighty-four years old and had one biological son, Donald Tinney.
- On October 11, 1990, Ruth Tinney legally adopted Kevin Tinney, who was thirty-eight years old at the time.
- On December 18, 1995, Ruth Tinney died intestate, meaning she did not have a will.
- Following her death, Kevin Tinney claimed he was entitled to a one-half ownership interest in Ruth's personal estate as one of her two sons.
Procedural Posture:
- Kevin Tinney filed a petition in the Newport Probate Court to probate Ruth Tinney's personal estate, listing himself as an heir.
- Donald Tinney, the decedent's biological son, filed an action in Superior Court seeking a declaratory judgment that Kevin was not entitled to inherit.
- In the Superior Court, Donald filed a motion for summary judgment, and Kevin filed a cross-motion for summary judgment.
- The Superior Court justice denied Donald's motion and granted Kevin's motion, entering a final judgment in Kevin's favor.
- Donald Tinney (appellant) appealed the Superior Court's judgment to the Supreme Court of Rhode Island.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does Rhode Island's intestacy statute, which grants inheritance rights to a lawfully adopted 'child,' also apply to a person who was adopted as an adult?
Opinions:
Majority - Bourcier, Justice
Yes. A person adopted as an adult has the same right to intestate inheritance from their adoptive parent as an adopted minor. The court reasoned that the term 'child' in the relevant inheritance statute (§ 15-7-16(a)) is clear and unambiguous, meaning the son or daughter of a parent, regardless of age. Reviewing the legislative history of adoption statutes in Rhode Island, the court found that while jurisdiction for adoptions was split between courts based on the adoptee's age, the Legislature never created a distinction in the inheritance rights granted to those adopted as minors versus those adopted as adults. The court emphasized its precedent of liberally construing adoption statutes to fully integrate adopted children into family units, concluding there was no legislative intent to differentiate between minor and adult adoptees for inheritance purposes.
Analysis:
This decision provides a definitive interpretation of Rhode Island's adoption and inheritance statutes, resolving an issue of first impression. It solidifies the legal status of adult adoptees, ensuring they are treated identically to minor adoptees and biological children for the purposes of intestate succession. The ruling prevents the creation of a 'second-class' status for adult adoptees and provides clarity for estate planning and probate litigation. By relying on plain meaning and legislative history, the court affirms the principle that adoption statutes are to be construed broadly to promote the integration of adoptees into the family unit.
