Thrift-Tel, Inc. v. Myron Bezenek et al.
46 Cal. App. 4th 1559 (1996)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
The unauthorized use of a computer system constitutes a trespass to chattels, and using a confidential access code to gain such access is an implied misrepresentation that can support a cause of action for fraud. However, a plaintiff has a duty to mitigate damages and must prove actual losses rather than relying on a PUC-approved tariff as a substitute measure of damages in a tort action.
Facts:
- Ryan and Gerry Bezenek were the teenage sons of defendants Myron and Susan Bezenek.
- In November 1991, the Bezenek children and their friends used a known confidential access code on the Bezeneks' home computer to enter Thrifty-Tel's long-distance telephone system.
- Over a three-day period, they conducted manual random searches for a six-digit authorization code to make free calls.
- Thrifty-Tel detected the unauthorized access almost immediately and, by late November 1991, had identified the Bezeneks' home as the source of the hacking.
- Despite knowing the source, Thrifty-Tel did not contact the Bezeneks or take any action to notify them of their sons' activities.
- After a three-month break, in February 1992, the Bezenek children resumed their efforts, using an automated computer program to conduct rapid-fire searches for an authorization code.
- This automated hacking ran for over six hours, generating more than 1,300 calls and overburdening Thrifty-Tel’s system, which prevented some subscribers from accessing phone lines.
- The Bezeneks first learned of their sons' computer activities when Thrifty-Tel filed a lawsuit against them on April 1, 1992.
Procedural Posture:
- Thrifty-Tel, Inc. sued Myron and Susan Bezenek in the superior court (trial court), alleging causes of action for conversion, fraud, and reasonable value of services.
- The case was tried before a judge without a jury.
- The trial court denied the Bezeneks' motion for judgment on the conversion and fraud claims.
- The trial court entered a judgment in favor of Thrifty-Tel, awarding $33,720 in damages based on the company's PUC-approved tariff, plus nearly $14,000 in attorney fees and costs.
- The Bezeneks, as appellants, appealed the judgment to the California Court of Appeal.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does the unauthorized use of a telephone company's computer system, by using a confidential access code to search for an authorization code, give rise to causes of action for trespass to chattels and fraud?
Opinions:
Majority - Crosby, Acting P. J.
Yes, the unauthorized use of a telephone company's computer system under these circumstances gives rise to causes of action for trespass to chattels and fraud. The court declined to decide if the intangible access codes could be converted, but held that the company pleaded and proved a claim for trespass to personal property. The electronic signals generated by the boys' computer were deemed sufficiently tangible to support a trespass cause of action, as they intentionally interfered with Thrifty-Tel's system and caused injury. Furthermore, the court found the elements of fraud were met. The use of the confidential access code constituted an implied misrepresentation that the boys were authorized users. The court reasoned that the computerized network acted as an agent that detrimentally relied on this misrepresentation by automatically granting access, allowing the boys to steal services. However, the court held that Thrifty-Tel failed its duty to mitigate damages by not contacting the Bezeneks after the first hacking incident in November 1991, thereby precluding recovery for the second, more damaging incident in February 1992. The court also ruled that damages must be based on proof of actual loss, not on the company's PUC-approved 'unauthorized usage' tariff, which functions as a liquidated damages clause and is inappropriate for a tort claim.
Analysis:
This is a significant early case in cyberlaw that demonstrates how traditional common law torts like trespass and fraud can be adapted to apply to unauthorized computer access. The court's decision to characterize electronic signals as 'sufficiently tangible' for a trespass claim created a foundational legal theory for addressing electronic intrusions. By accepting that a computer system can be the object of 'reliance' for a fraud claim, the court modernized the tort to fit the automated realities of the digital age. This case also reinforces the fundamental tort principles of mitigation and proof of actual damages, preventing plaintiffs in technology-related cases from recovering windfall judgments based on pre-set penalty tariffs.
Unlock the full brief for Thrift-Tel, Inc. v. Myron Bezenek et al.