Thompson v. Baxter
107 Minn. 122, 119 N.W. 797, 1909 Minn. LEXIS 522 (1909)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A lease for an indefinite term that is terminable upon an event dependent on the lessee's will, such as their desire to live in a certain location, creates a determinable life estate, not a tenancy at will.
Facts:
- A property owner leased a residence in Albert Lea, Minnesota to the defendant, Baxter, for a monthly rent of twenty-two dollars.
- The lease agreement stated the term was 'for and during the full term of while he [Baxter] shall wish to live in Albert Lea.'
- Plaintiff Thompson subsequently purchased the property, taking title subject to Baxter's existing lease.
- Baxter has continued to live in Albert Lea and has paid all rent due under the lease since the agreement began in 1904.
Procedural Posture:
- Plaintiff Thompson initiated a forcible entry and unlawful detainer action against defendant Baxter in a justice court (court of first instance).
- The justice court entered a judgment in favor of the defendant, Baxter.
- Plaintiff Thompson, as appellant, appealed the judgment to the district court (intermediate appellate court).
- The district court affirmed the judgment for the defendant, Baxter.
- Plaintiff Thompson, as appellant, appealed the district court's judgment to the Supreme Court of Minnesota.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a lease granting a tenant possession 'for and during the full term of while he shall wish to live in Albert Lea' create a terminable tenancy at will, or does it create a life estate?
Opinions:
Majority - Brown, J.
No. A lease for the term 'while he shall wish to live in Albert Lea' does not create a tenancy at will; it creates a determinable life estate. The court reasoned that the lease does not fit the definitions of a tenancy at will, at sufferance, or from month to month. A tenancy at will is characterized by an indefinite term and the right of either party to terminate it, but here the term is limited by a specific event (Baxter's removal from Albert Lea) and the right to terminate is not reserved to the lessor. The lease creates a freehold interest, not a chattel interest. Citing established legal principles, the court found that grants made for an uncertain duration, subject to being defeated by a particular event tied to the grantee, are considered life estates. Examples include grants 'so long as he shall inhabit a certain place' or 'to a woman during her widowhood.' Therefore, the lease vested in Baxter a life estate, terminable only upon his death or his removal from Albert Lea.
Analysis:
This decision solidifies the distinction between a tenancy at will and a determinable life estate based on the nature of the lease's termination clause. By classifying a tenancy based on the lessee's volition as a life estate, the court grants tenants significantly greater property rights and security than they would have under a tenancy at will, which landlords can terminate with proper notice. This precedent impacts the interpretation of ambiguous lease terms, favoring the creation of a more stable, freehold estate for the tenant when the duration is tied to the tenant's own actions or desires. It reinforces the principle that the language of the instrument, reflecting the parties' intent, is paramount in defining the nature of the estate created.
