Texas Employers' Ins. v. Price
291 S.W. 287 (1926)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
Under the Texas Workmen’s Compensation Act, the statutory requirement that a suit to set aside an award of the Industrial Accident Board must be brought in the county where the injury occurred is a jurisdictional mandate. Consequently, when an injury occurs outside of Texas, no Texas court has jurisdiction to hear an appeal of the Board's decision, making the Board's ruling final.
Facts:
- On January 1, 1924, Guy E. Price, a Texas resident, entered into an employment contract in El Paso, Texas, with C. E. Goetting, also a Texas resident.
- The contract was for Price to work as a mechanic on a road project in Lee county, New Mexico.
- On February 4, 1924, while acting in the course of his employment, Price suffered injuries in Lee county, New Mexico.
- Goetting was notified of the injuries and initially took Price to a hospital in New Mexico for treatment.
- Price was later transferred to a hospital in El Paso, Texas, where he underwent surgery for his injuries on September 21, 1924.
Procedural Posture:
- Guy E. Price filed a claim for compensation with the Industrial Accident Board of Texas.
- The Industrial Accident Board dismissed Price's claim, ruling it was not filed within the six-month statutory period.
- Price gave notice that he would not abide by the Board's decision and filed suit against the Texas Employers’ Insurance Association in the district court of El Paso County, Texas, to set aside the award.
- The district court (trial court) found in favor of Price.
- Texas Employers’ Insurance Association, as appellant, appealed the district court's judgment to this court, the Court of Civil Appeals of Texas.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a Texas district court have jurisdiction to hear a suit to set aside a final ruling of the Industrial Accident Board when the employee's injury occurred outside the state of Texas?
Opinions:
Majority - Walthall, J.
No. A Texas district court does not have jurisdiction to hear a suit to set aside a ruling of the Industrial Accident Board when the injury occurred outside of Texas. The rights and remedies under the Workmen’s Compensation Act are purely statutory, and its provisions are exclusive and mandatory. While the Act explicitly allows an employee hired in Texas to receive compensation for injuries sustained out-of-state, it also requires that any suit to set aside a Board decision 'shall be brought in the county where the injury occurred.' Citing Mingus v. Wadley, the court affirmed that this requirement is not a matter of venue but is a mandatory and jurisdictional prerequisite. Because the injury occurred in New Mexico, there is no county in Texas where the suit can be filed. As the Legislature has not provided an alternative forum for such cases, the Board's decision is final.
Analysis:
This decision reveals a significant jurisdictional gap in the Texas Workmen's Compensation Act of that era. By strictly construing the statute's venue provision as a jurisdictional mandate, the court effectively denies judicial review for Texas-hired employees injured outside the state. While the law grants them a substantive right to compensation, this ruling makes the Industrial Accident Board the final arbiter of their claims, stripping them of the right to appeal an adverse decision to a court. The case highlights a legislative oversight and demonstrates how a seemingly procedural requirement can have a profound substantive impact, potentially prompting legislative amendment to provide a proper forum for such appeals.
