Tenuto v. Lederle Laboratories, Division of American Cyanamid Co.
687 N.E.2d 1300, 90 N.Y.2d 606, 665 N.Y.S.2d 17 (1997)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A physician's duty of care can extend to non-patients, such as the parents of a pediatric patient, to warn them of foreseeable risks associated with the patient's treatment when a special relationship of reliance exists between the physician and the non-patients.
Facts:
- In May 1979, Dominick and Elizabeth Tenuto brought their five-month-old daughter to their pediatrician, Dr. Leroy Schwartz.
- Dr. Schwartz administered an oral polio vaccine, 'Orimune', manufactured by Lederle Laboratories, which contained live but weakened polio viruses.
- The vaccine carried a known, rare risk of 'contact polio,' where the live virus could revert to a virulent form and be transmitted to the infant's caregivers through bodily fluids.
- The vaccine's manufacturer, Lederle, included a package insert recommending that doctors warn parents of this risk.
- Dr. Schwartz was aware that Mr. Tenuto was about to undergo elective surgery, which could increase his vulnerability.
- Dr. Schwartz did not inquire about Mr. Tenuto's vaccination history nor did he warn the Tenutos about the risk of contact polio or advise them on necessary precautions.
- Following his surgery, Mr. Tenuto cared for his daughter and was exposed to the virulent polio virus.
- Within 30 days of the vaccination, Mr. Tenuto was diagnosed with paralytic poliomyelitis, which rendered him a permanent paraplegic.
Procedural Posture:
- Dominick and Elizabeth Tenuto (plaintiffs) sued Dr. Schwartz and Lederle Laboratories in the Supreme Court of New York (the trial court of first instance).
- Dr. Schwartz filed a motion to dismiss the complaint against him, arguing he owed no duty to the Tenutos because they were not his patients.
- The Supreme Court granted Dr. Schwartz's motion to dismiss.
- The Tenutos appealed the dismissal to the Appellate Division (an intermediate appellate court).
- The Appellate Division affirmed the trial court's order, agreeing that no duty was owed to the non-patient parents.
- The Tenutos were granted leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals (New York's highest court).
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a physician owe a duty of care to the parents of an infant patient to warn them of the risk of contracting a disease from the infant's vaccination, even though the parents are not the physician's patients?
Opinions:
Majority - Levine, J.
Yes, a physician owes a duty of care to the parents of an infant patient under these circumstances. The court reasoned that while the parents were not direct patients, a physician's duty can extend to third parties where a 'special relationship' exists. This special relationship arises from the unique context of pediatric care, where the physician is engaged by the parents to treat their child and the services, by necessity, require advising the parents. The parents are a determinate and identified class—immediate family members—who foreseeably rely on the physician's expertise for their own protection in relation to the patient's care. Extending the duty is supported by precedents involving warnings about communicable diseases and is necessary to give meaning to the manufacturer's duty to warn the physician.
Analysis:
This decision significantly broadens the scope of a physician's duty in New York by establishing that a direct doctor-patient relationship is not an absolute prerequisite for a duty to warn. It solidifies the 'special relationship' exception, particularly in the context of pediatrics, where physicians must now consider the foreseeable health risks to parents and caregivers arising from a child's treatment. The case sets a precedent that a physician's duty can extend to a limited, identifiable class of non-patients who rely on the physician's advice and are foreseeably endangered by the patient's medical care.
