Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America v. Tribune Co.
670 F. Supp. 491 (1987)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A preliminary agreement that contains open terms, requires future approvals, and anticipates the execution of final documents can be a binding contract if the language of the agreement and the surrounding circumstances reflect the parties' intent to be bound to negotiate the open issues in good faith.
Facts:
- Tribune Company sought to sell the Daily News Building and obtain a 'match-fund' loan to realize immediate cash while deferring taxes and keeping the debt off its balance sheet.
- A key loan feature for Tribune's accounting goals was a 'put' option, allowing it to repay the loan by assigning a mortgage note from the building's buyer to the lender.
- Tribune told Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America (Teachers) that its objective was off-balance-sheet accounting and that it needed a 'firm commitment' for the loan by September 15, 1982.
- On September 22, 1982, Teachers sent Tribune a commitment letter outlining the major economic terms of the loan and stating it would 'become a binding agreement' upon acceptance.
- Despite its lawyers' concerns about the 'binding agreement' language, Tribune's Treasurer signed and returned the letter on October 6, adding that acceptance was 'subject to approval by the Company’s Board of Directors and the preparation and execution of legal documentation satisfactory to the Company.'
- Between October and December 1982, market interest rates fell significantly, making the 15.25% interest rate in the commitment letter unfavorable to Tribune.
- During this same period, Tribune's accountants began to doubt whether the off-balance-sheet accounting treatment would be permissible under new accounting standards.
- Tribune then refused to continue negotiations unless Teachers agreed to add a new condition making the loan contingent on Tribune's ability to use off-balance-sheet accounting, which Teachers refused.
Procedural Posture:
- Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America sued Tribune Company in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
- The suit alleged that Tribune breached the commitment letter agreement.
- The case proceeded to a non-jury trial before the District Judge, who issued these findings of fact and conclusions of law.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a detailed loan commitment letter that expressly states it is a 'binding agreement' but leaves some terms open for future negotiation and is subject to the preparation of satisfactory final documents and board approval, create an enforceable duty to negotiate in good faith?
Opinions:
Majority - Leval, District Judge
Yes. A preliminary commitment letter can create a binding obligation to negotiate in good faith. The court found that this was a 'binding preliminary commitment'—a mutual commitment to negotiate the remaining open issues in good faith within the agreed-upon framework. The court looked to the parties' intent, which was clearly expressed through the 'binding agreement' language in the letter and Tribune's own request for a 'firm commitment.' Reservations such as the need for board approval and satisfactory documentation did not nullify the intent to be bound; they simply preserved the parties' right to negotiate customary terms in good faith, not a right to abandon the deal unilaterally. Tribune breached its duty to negotiate in good faith by renouncing the deal and insisting on a new condition—satisfactory accounting treatment—that was not part of the preliminary agreement. The court found that the decline in interest rates substantially influenced Tribune's decision to back out of the now-unfavorable deal.
Analysis:
This is a landmark case that established and clarified the legal enforceability of 'Type II' preliminary agreements in New York law. It affirmed that parties can bind themselves to negotiate in good faith, even if they have not yet agreed on all terms. The decision provides security for parties in complex transactions who rely on commitment letters to plan and allocate resources before final documentation is complete. Following this case, parties entering into letters of intent or preliminary agreements must be exceptionally clear if they do not wish to be bound, as courts will look past 'subject to' clauses to determine the parties' true intent from the overall context and language.
Unlock the full brief for Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America v. Tribune Co.