Tandycrafts, Inc. v. Initio Partners
1989 Del. LEXIS 327, 562 A.2d 1162 (1989)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A shareholder who brings an individual, direct lawsuit is entitled to an award of attorney's fees from the corporation if the suit confers a substantial benefit upon the corporation or all of its shareholders, even if the action is not brought derivatively or as a class action.
Facts:
- Initio Partners ('Initio'), the largest single independent shareholder of Tandycrafts, Inc. ('Tandycrafts'), owned approximately 9.9% of the company’s common stock.
- After Initio's attempt to acquire a larger stake in the company was rebuffed, Tandycrafts' management proposed two charter amendments that would impose an 80% supermajority voting requirement for takeover proposals made without director approval.
- Initio contended that Tandycrafts' proxy materials for the annual meeting were materially misleading because they failed to disclose that management (7.5%) and the company's employee benefit plan (10.9%) collectively held enough shares to make attaining an 80% vote virtually impossible.
- In addition to filing a lawsuit, Initio launched its own proxy campaign to counter the information in Tandycrafts' materials.
- After Initio filed its lawsuit, Tandycrafts distributed a supplemental proxy statement to shareholders which disclosed the combined holdings of management and the employee benefit plan, and clarified other provisions.
- At the subsequent annual meeting, shareholders voted to defeat the proposed charter amendments.
Procedural Posture:
- Initio Partners filed an individual complaint against Tandycrafts, Inc. in the Delaware Court of Chancery (trial court).
- Initio sought a preliminary injunction to enjoin Tandycrafts' upcoming annual shareholder meeting.
- The Vice Chancellor denied Initio's motion for a preliminary injunction.
- After the charter amendments were defeated at the meeting, Initio moved to dismiss its action as moot and filed an application for attorney's fees.
- The Court of Chancery granted the application and awarded Initio $180,000 in counsel fees.
- Tandycrafts, Inc. (appellant) appealed the fee award to the Delaware Supreme Court, with Initio Partners as the appellee.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Under Delaware law, is an individual shareholder who files a direct, non-derivative, non-class action lawsuit entitled to an award of attorney's fees from the corporation if the lawsuit confers a benefit on the corporation or all of its shareholders?
Opinions:
Majority - Walsh, Justice
Yes, an individual shareholder who brings a direct action can be awarded attorney's fees if the litigation confers a benefit on the corporation or its shareholders. The right to fee-shifting under the common benefit doctrine does not depend on the form of the suit, but rather on whether the plaintiff's efforts conferred a benefit on others. The court's primary inquiry is not the status of the plaintiff, but the nature of the benefit causally related to the lawsuit. While the American Rule generally requires each party to pay its own fees, the common benefit exception is an equitable tool designed to reward individual effort that benefits a class. Here, Initio's lawsuit prompted Tandycrafts to issue corrective disclosures, which provided a clear benefit to all shareholders by allowing for a more informed vote. Once a plaintiff shows that a corporate benefit chronologically followed the filing of a meritorious suit, the burden shifts to the corporation to prove that the lawsuit did not cause its action, a burden Tandycrafts failed to meet.
Analysis:
This decision significantly clarifies Delaware's 'common benefit' doctrine for awarding attorney's fees. It establishes that the substance of the litigation's outcome—a benefit conferred on all shareholders—is more important than the procedural form of the lawsuit (individual vs. class or derivative). This ruling incentivizes individual shareholders to pursue meritorious litigation challenging corporate actions, particularly in proxy contests, by providing a mechanism to recover costs without needing to meet the formal requirements of a class or derivative action. The decision reinforces the Court of Chancery's equitable power to reward litigation that enhances corporate governance and shareholder rights, while noting the court's role in preventing abuse of this principle.
