Swanson v. Swanson
514 S.E.2d 822, 270 Ga. 733, 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 1131 (1999)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A remainder interest that is vested at the time of its creation is only divested if a specific condition subsequent, as articulated in the will or trust, actually occurs. The law favors the early vesting of remainders and construes conditions as subsequent rather than precedent in cases of doubt.
Facts:
- In 1970, George Swanson died, and his will established two trusts.
- The trusts provided his wife, Gertrude Swanson, with a life estate.
- Upon Gertrude's death, the remainder of the trusts was to be divided among George's nine children, including his son, Bennie Swanson.
- The trust provisions stated that if any child died before Gertrude, that child's share would go to his or her surviving children.
- Bennie Swanson died testate before his mother, Gertrude.
- Bennie was survived by his wife, Peggy Swanson, who was the sole beneficiary under his will.
- Bennie had no children.
- After Bennie's death, Gertrude Swanson died, terminating the life estate.
Procedural Posture:
- After Gertrude Swanson's death, Peggy Swanson and other relatives filed a declaratory judgment action in the trial court to determine their rights under the trusts.
- The trial court granted summary judgment against Peggy Swanson, ruling she was not entitled to Bennie's remainder interests in the trusts.
- Peggy Swanson, as appellant, appealed the trial court's grant of summary judgment to the Supreme Court of Georgia.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a child's vested remainder interest in a trust, which is subject to defeasance if the child predeceases the life tenant and leaves surviving children, pass to the child's estate if the child predeceases the life tenant but leaves no children?
Opinions:
Majority - Fletcher, Presiding Justice.
Yes. A vested remainder is not defeased and passes to the remainderman's estate unless a condition subsequent, which would cause divestment, specifically occurs. Bennie Swanson's interest was a vested remainder because he was an identifiable person who would take if the life estate ended. The trusts attached conditions subsequent that could have divested his interest, such as dying before Gertrude while leaving surviving children. Since Bennie died childless, this condition did not occur. Georgia law strongly favors the early vesting of remainders and construing conditions as subsequent, and there was no clear language of survivorship to prevent Bennie's vested, non-defeaséd interest from passing under his will to his wife, Peggy.
Dissenting - Sears, Justice
No. The testator's intent, when viewing the will as a whole, required Bennie to survive the life tenant to maintain his interest. The primary goal in will construction is to ascertain the testator's intent, which should override the mechanical application of construction preferences like early vesting. The language of the trusts, such as references to "surviving children" and the testator's stated desire to exclude "a stranger to my estate," demonstrates a clear intent to keep the property within the family bloodline. Because Bennie did not survive his mother, he was divested of his interest, and therefore his wife, Peggy, is not entitled to a share of the trusts.
Analysis:
This decision reinforces Georgia's strong preference for the early vesting of future interests and a strict interpretation of conditions subsequent. The court prioritizes these established rules of construction over a more flexible interpretation aimed at discerning the testator's likely intent. This holding clarifies that for a vested remainder to be divested, the specific conditions for divestment must be met exactly as written; courts will not infer a general survivorship requirement from ambiguous language. The case serves as a caution to estate planners to use explicit and unambiguous language, such as "to my then-living children," if the intent is to require a remainderman to survive a life tenant.
