Succession of Watson
1987 WL 1480, 517 So. 2d 276 (1987)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
Under Louisiana law (La.C.C.P. art. 3154), forced heirs have a mandatory, non-waivable right to compel the executor of an estate to furnish security, even if the decedent's will expressly dispenses with this requirement.
Facts:
- Frances Doyle Watson created a handwritten (olographic) will.
- The will named her husband, John Milton Watson, as the executor of her estate.
- The will explicitly stated that John Milton Watson was 'dispensed from furnishing security.'
- Frances Watson's will bequeathed the 'forced portion' of her estate to her children, Sylvia Watson and John Earl Watson, and her granddaughter, Laurie Watson.
- The will granted John Milton Watson the 'disposable portion' of the estate and a lifetime usufruct (the right to use and benefit from) over the forced portion.
- Frances Doyle Watson passed away.
Procedural Posture:
- Frances Doyle Watson's will was admitted to probate in the trial court.
- Forced heirs Sylvia Watson and Laurie Watson filed a petition in the trial court to compel the executor, John Milton Watson, to furnish security.
- After a hearing, the trial court ordered John Milton Watson to post security in the amount of $30,000.
- John Milton Watson, as executor and appellant, appealed the trial court's order to the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a provision in a will dispensing an executor from the obligation of furnishing security prevent forced heirs from compelling the executor to furnish security under Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure Article 3154?
Opinions:
Majority - Chiasson, J.
No. A provision in a will dispensing an executor from furnishing security is ineffective against the statutory right of forced heirs to demand it. The court found that Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure Article 3154 is mandatory. The article states that if a court finds a petitioner seeking security is a forced heir, it 'shall order the executor to furnish security.' The use of the word 'shall' leaves no discretion for the trial court to deny the request; its only discretion is in determining an amount adequate to protect the heirs' interests. The court further clarified that the executor's dual role as a usufructuary, who might not be required to furnish security in that capacity, does not negate his separate obligation to furnish security in his capacity as executor when demanded by forced heirs.
Analysis:
This decision firmly establishes that the protection of forced heirs is a paramount public policy in Louisiana succession law that overrides a testator's express intent. It confirms that the right granted to forced heirs under La.C.C.P. art. 3154 is absolute and cannot be waived by the decedent in their will. The ruling clarifies the mandatory nature of the statute, leaving trial courts with no discretion to deny a forced heir's petition for security. This precedent solidifies a key protection for those with legally reserved shares in an estate, ensuring their inheritance is financially secured during the administration process.
