Street v. State
513 A.2d 870, 307 Md. 262, 67 A.L.R. 4th 1095 (1986)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
For a common-law crime for which no specific penalty is prescribed by statute, a trial court has the discretion to impose a sentence of a fine, imprisonment, or both, limited only by the constitutional prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment.
Facts:
- Valerie McNeal took a taxi driven by George Street.
- Upon arrival, the fare was $2.50, but McNeal was four cents short of the exact amount in change and offered a ten-dollar bill for payment.
- Street refused the ten-dollar bill, citing an ordinance that cab drivers need not carry more than $5.00 in change, and rejected McNeal's suggestion to get change nearby.
- When McNeal attempted to exit the vehicle, she discovered the doors were locked, and Street, who controlled the locks, refused to release her.
- Street held McNeal in the cab against her will for approximately twenty-five minutes.
- A passerby, Cora Williams, intervened and persuaded Street to accept the ten-dollar bill for the now $5.20 fare.
- Street did not release McNeal until after a police officer arrived on the scene.
Procedural Posture:
- George Street was charged with false imprisonment.
- Following a trial in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City (trial court), Street was convicted.
- The trial judge sentenced Street to one-year imprisonment (suspended in favor of three years probation) and a $500 fine.
- Street, as appellant, appealed to the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland (intermediate appellate court), which affirmed the judgment.
- Street then petitioned the Court of Appeals of Maryland (the state's highest court) for a writ of certiorari, which was granted.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a trial court have the authority to impose a fine as part of the sentence for a conviction of the common-law crime of false imprisonment when no penalty is prescribed by statute?
Opinions:
Majority - Cole, J.
Yes, a trial court has the authority to impose a fine as a penalty for the common-law offense of false imprisonment. False imprisonment is a common-law misdemeanor in Maryland, and at common law, misdemeanors were punishable by fine, imprisonment, or both. The court's precedent establishes that the only restrictions on sentencing for a common-law crime, absent a statutory penalty, are that the sentence must be within the reasonable discretion of the trial judge and must not constitute cruel and unusual punishment. The court rejected the appellant's argument that the penalty for the greater statutory offense of kidnapping, which does not include a fine, should limit the penalty for the lesser common-law offense, noting that statutory penalties for greater offenses do not restrict sentencing for common-law crimes. Therefore, the $500 fine was a reasonable exercise of the trial judge's discretion.
Analysis:
This decision solidifies the broad sentencing discretion of trial judges in Maryland for common-law offenses that lack statutory penalties. It affirms that fines are a historically grounded and permissible form of punishment for such crimes, rooted in English common law. The ruling also reinforces the principle that sentencing for common-law offenses is not constrained by the penalty schemes of related, greater statutory crimes, ensuring that judicial discretion remains the primary guide, limited only by the constitutional prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment.
