Straughn v. GAC Properties, Inc.
360 So. 2d 385 (1978)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
The 'just valuation' requirement of the Florida Constitution does not mandate inter-county uniformity in property tax assessments. A cause of action does not lie against the state's Department of Revenue to compel equalization of ad valorem tax valuations based solely on a discrepancy between the assessed value of identical property in two different counties.
Facts:
- GAC Properties, Inc. owns a large, undeveloped tract of land.
- This single tract of land straddles the border between Osceola County and Polk County, Florida.
- For the 1975 tax year, the Polk County tax appraiser valued the portion of the property in that county at $300 per lot.
- For the same tax year, the Osceola County tax appraiser valued the portion of the property in that county at $560 per lot.
Procedural Posture:
- GAC Properties sued in trial court to reduce its Osceola County tax assessment, naming the Department of Revenue as a defendant in Count II of its complaint.
- The trial court granted the Department's motion and dismissed Count II of the complaint.
- On an interlocutory appeal, the Fourth District Court of Appeal (an intermediate appellate court) reversed the trial court's dismissal, holding that a cause of action was properly stated against the Department.
- The Supreme Court of Florida granted certiorari to review the decision of the district court.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a discrepancy in ad valorem tax valuations for identical property located in two different counties create a cause of action against the state's Department of Revenue to compel equalization under the 'just valuation' requirement of the Florida Constitution?
Opinions:
Majority - Justice England
No. A taxpayer cannot compel the Department of Revenue to equalize values merely on the basis of an allegation that different values have been assigned to adjacent properties of like character in different counties. The Florida Constitution assigns primary responsibility for property assessment to individual county tax appraisers. Therefore, inter-county assessment uniformity is not constitutionally required. Citing Spooner v. Askew and Armstrong v. State ex rel. Beaty, the court reasoned that variations between counties are not a basis for lowering tax assessments so long as the assessment is not greater than 100% of fair market value and is not unequal in relation to other properties within the same county. While the legislature and the Department of Revenue work towards statewide uniformity, this goal is incremental and cannot override the constitutional authority of county officers.
Analysis:
This decision solidifies the principle of county-level autonomy in ad valorem taxation in Florida, reinforcing the constitutional role of county tax appraisers. It clarifies that the Department of Revenue's authority is supervisory and aimed at procedural uniformity, not at mandating specific assessment outcomes to equalize values across county lines. The ruling effectively limits a taxpayer's ability to challenge an assessment based on inter-county comparisons, forcing such challenges to focus on intra-county disparities or assessments exceeding fair market value. This precedent protects the decentralized assessment system from legal challenges that could otherwise force a de facto statewide assessment scheme.
Unlock the full brief for Straughn v. GAC Properties, Inc.