Strank v. Mercy Hospital of Johnstown
383 Pa. 54, 117 A.2d 697, 1955 Pa. LEXIS 308 (1955)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A court of equity has jurisdiction to grant specific relief for the breach of an express or implied contract when the legal remedy of money damages is inadequate because the harm is speculative or indeterminate.
Facts:
- Plaintiff, a student nurse named Strank, enrolled in a school of nursing conducted by the defendant, Mercy Hospital of Johnstown.
- Strank paid the required expenses for the nursing program.
- She successfully completed the prescribed curriculum for the first two years of the three-year program.
- In her third year, Strank was dismissed from the school for breaking a rule by staying away overnight without permission.
- Strank requested transfer credits for the two years of work she had completed so she could gain advanced standing at another nursing school.
- Mercy Hospital refused to provide Strank with her transfer credits.
Procedural Posture:
- Plaintiff Strank initially brought an action in mandamus in the Court of Common Pleas to compel the defendant hospital to issue her credits.
- The defendant filed preliminary objections challenging the court's jurisdiction for a mandamus action.
- The mandamus complaint was dismissed, a decision which was previously affirmed on appeal, because the duty was contractual, not one imposed by law.
- Following the dismissal, Strank instituted the present proceedings in equity in the Court of Common Pleas.
- Defendant again filed preliminary objections to Strank's complaint and amended complaint, arguing the court lacked equity jurisdiction.
- The Court of Common Pleas entered a decree dismissing the defendant's objections and ordering it to file an answer.
- The defendant, Mercy Hospital, appealed the trial court's jurisdictional ruling to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a court of equity have jurisdiction to compel a nursing school to issue transfer credits to a dismissed student when money damages for the refusal would be an inadequate remedy?
Opinions:
Majority - Mr. Chief Justice Horace Stern
Yes, a court of equity has jurisdiction in this matter. The courts of common pleas possess the powers of a court of chancery to afford specific relief when a recovery in damages would be an inadequate remedy. Here, the measurement of damages for the loss of time and the inability to pursue a nursing career would be speculative and indeterminate, making the legal remedy inadequate. Equity's province is to enforce obligations arising from contracts—whether express, oral, or implied—and it would be a 'reproach to our system of jurisprudence' if Strank had a right to her credits but no court could provide an adequate means of redress.
Analysis:
This decision reinforces the fundamental principle of equity jurisdiction: that equity courts act when the law cannot provide an adequate remedy. It solidifies the view that the relationship between a student and a private educational institution is contractual in nature. By allowing the case to proceed in equity, the court affirms that specific performance (compelling an action, like issuing credits) is a viable remedy in educational contract disputes, particularly when the harm to a student's career is difficult to quantify in monetary terms. This precedent ensures that students are not left without a meaningful remedy when an institution's breach of contract threatens their professional future.
